These choices persist and are added to shared URLs.
Minyari
Western Australia, Australia · Developing · 100.0% ownedManual entry
Current R&R by category
Whole-project rollup at the latest vintage per category: printed project-level rows are preferred, and mining areas are summed (tonnes-weighted grade) only where the issuer prints no project-level row. Per-area and per-source detail in the Current R&R table below.
Au
Category
Tonnes (Mt)
Grade (g/t Au)
Contained (Moz Au)
As at
Measured
—
—
—
—
Indicated
34.10 Mt
1.60 g/t
1.80 Moz
18 Dec 2025
Inferred
20.70 Mt
1.28 g/t
0.85 Moz
21 May 2025
Total Resources
54.80 Mt
1.48 g/t
2.65 Moz
18 Dec 2025
Proved
—
—
—
—
Probable
—
—
—
—
Total Reserves
—
—
—
—
Ag
Category
Tonnes (Mt)
Grade (g/t Ag)
Contained (Moz Ag)
As at
Measured
—
—
—
—
Indicated
34.10 Mt
0.50 g/t
0.55 Moz
18 Dec 2025
Inferred
20.70 Mt
0.27 g/t
0.13 Moz
21 May 2025
Total Resources
54.80 Mt
0.41 g/t
0.68 Moz
18 Dec 2025
Proved
—
—
—
—
Probable
Cu
Category
Tonnes (Mt)
Grade (% Cu)
Contained (Mt Cu)
As at
Measured
—
—
—
—
Indicated
34.10 Mt
0.19%
0.07 Mt Cu
18 Dec 2025
Inferred
20.70 Mt
0.13%
0.02 Mt Cu
21 May 2025
Total Resources
54.80 Mt
0.17%
0.09 Mt Cu
18 Dec 2025
Proved
—
—
—
—
Probable
Co
Category
Tonnes (Mt)
Grade (% Co)
Contained (Mt Co)
As at
Measured
—
—
—
—
Indicated
34.10 Mt
0.03%
0.01 Mt Co
18 Dec 2025
Inferred
20.70 Mt
0.02%
3 kt Co
21 May 2025
Total Resources
69.00 Mt
0.03%
0.01 Mt Co
02 Apr 2026
Proved
—
—
—
—
Probable
Cut-off grade
0.3000 g/t Ag · 0.4000 g/t Ag · 0.3000 g/t Au · 0.4000 g/t Au · 0.4000 % Co · 0.3000 % Co · 0.3000 % Cu · 0.4000 % Cu
Price assumption
—
JORC code year
2012
Peer benchmark — developing Au projects (284 with resources)Resource size P76Resource grade P65View on grade-tonnage chart →
Percentile of this project's current total Resource among covered peers (P100 = largest / highest grade). Basis and Inferred toggles apply.
Cutoff 0.30 % Co — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
QA notes:
QA BLOCK: conflicting duplicate — this (project, mining area, commodity, classification, category, as-at date) appears 2 times in the document WITH DIFFERENT figures. At most one copy matches the print; verify each against the document and reject the rest (a copy whose figures appear nowhere in the text is fabricated). QA BLOCK: recomputed contained 20700.0000 t Co vs reported 13000 t Co (59.23% disagreement)
QA note: issuer print internally irreconcilable ('0.03% cobalt' x 69Mt = 20.7kt vs printed '13 kt of cobalt'); both stored values ARE the printed values and contained cross-foots with the Dome narrative; + garbled-header date fix
Cutoff 0.30 g/t Au — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
QA notes:
vision-extracted (page images): QA INFO: recompute differs 3.15% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±5.59% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled.
t90a merge: re-homed from the retired 'Minyari Dome' project into 'Minyari'; figures and status unchanged
Cutoff 0.30 g/t Ag — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
QA notes:
vision-extracted (page images): QA INFO: recompute differs 8.05% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±12.47% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled.
t90a merge: re-homed from the retired 'Minyari Dome' project into 'Minyari'; figures and status unchanged
Cutoff 0.30 % Co — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
QA notes:
vision-extracted (page images): QA WARN: cross-category subtotal — this total_resource row on area 'Fiama' equals the sum of the same area's indicated+inferred leaves — a per-deposit M&I/P&P-style total (t24 LUN/LUG NI 43-101 class). Policy keeps category leaves + the whole-project Total; adjudicate per the per-property-totals precedent before approval. QA BLOCK: recomputed contained 0.0000 t Co vs reported 130 t Co (100.00% disagreement)
t90a merge: re-homed from the retired 'Minyari Dome' project into 'Minyari'; figures and status unchanged
Cutoff 0.40 g/t Ag — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
QA notes:
QA BLOCK: project 'Minyari Dome' matches an approved mining AREA of project 'Minyari' — likely deposit-as-project fragmentation; approving would create a phantom project and double the company rollup. Re-file as (project='Minyari', area='Minyari Dome') or reject. QA INFO: recompute differs 2.10% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained are only good to ±6.06% (rounding granularity) — treated as reconciled.
QA fix: re-filed under the canonical project (Minyari) — the document reports deposits of the 100%-owned Minyari project; deposit label kept as mining_area
Cutoff 0.40 g/t Au — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
QA notes:
QA BLOCK: project 'Minyari Dome' matches an approved mining AREA of project 'Minyari' — likely deposit-as-project fragmentation; approving would create a phantom project and double the company rollup. Re-file as (project='Minyari', area='Minyari Dome') or reject.
QA fix: re-filed under the canonical project (Minyari) — the document reports deposits of the 100%-owned Minyari project; deposit label kept as mining_area
Cutoff 0.40 % Co — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
QA notes:
QA BLOCK: project 'Minyari Dome' matches an approved mining AREA of project 'Minyari' — likely deposit-as-project fragmentation; approving would create a phantom project and double the company rollup. Re-file as (project='Minyari', area='Minyari Dome') or reject. QA INFO: recompute differs 10.82% from the printed contained figure, but the print is exactly consistent with the recompute at the printed tonnes/grade/contained granularity (rounding-interval overlap) — treated as reconciled.
QA fix: re-filed under the canonical project (Minyari) — the document reports deposits of the 100%-owned Minyari project; deposit label kept as mining_area
Cutoff 0.30 g/t Ag — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
QA notes:
vision-extracted (page images): QA INFO: recompute differs 4.47% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±8.62% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled.
t90a merge: re-homed from the retired 'Minyari Dome' project into 'Minyari'; figures and status unchanged
Cutoff 0.30 g/t Au — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
QA notes:
vision-extracted (page images): QA INFO: recompute differs 20.28% from the printed contained figure, but the print is exactly consistent with the recompute at the printed tonnes/grade/contained granularity (rounding-interval overlap) — treated as reconciled.
t90a merge: re-homed from the retired 'Minyari Dome' project into 'Minyari'; figures and status unchanged
Cutoff 0.30 % Co — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
QA notes:
vision-extracted (page images): QA WARN: per-area total_resource row on area 'GEO-01 Central' beside same-area category leaves — the per-deposit total shape policy rejects (leaves + whole-project Total only). Its tonnes do NOT reconcile with the stored leaves' sum, so a leaf may be corrupted or missing too (t57 LM8: the Upper indicated leaf carried the Total line's figures) — verify every row of this area against the print. QA BLOCK: recomputed contained 0.0000 t Co vs reported 3 t Co (100.00% disagreement)
t90a merge: re-homed from the retired 'Minyari Dome' project into 'Minyari'; figures and status unchanged
Cutoff 0.30 g/t Ag — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
QA notes:
vision-extracted (page images): QA INFO: recompute differs 5.94% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±12.20% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled.
t90a merge: re-homed from the retired 'Minyari Dome' project into 'Minyari'; figures and status unchanged
Cutoff 0.30 % Co — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
QA notes:
vision-extracted (page images): QA WARN: cross-category subtotal — this total_resource row on area 'GEO-01 Main Zone' equals the sum of the same area's indicated+inferred leaves — a per-deposit M&I/P&P-style total (t24 LUN/LUG NI 43-101 class). Policy keeps category leaves + the whole-project Total; adjudicate per the per-property-totals precedent before approval. QA BLOCK: recomputed contained 0.0000 t Co vs reported 70 t Co (100.00% disagreement)
t90a merge: re-homed from the retired 'Minyari Dome' project into 'Minyari'; figures and status unchanged
Cutoff 0.30 g/t Au — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
QA notes:
vision-extracted (page images): QA INFO: recompute differs 4.17% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±6.83% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled.
t90a merge: re-homed from the retired 'Minyari Dome' project into 'Minyari'; figures and status unchanged
Cutoff 0.30 g/t Ag — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
QA notes:
vision-extracted (page images): QA BLOCK: recomputed contained 2507.7582 oz vs reported 9000 oz (72.14% disagreement)
t89 QA hold (parked): Minella indicated Ag unreconcilable: 300,000 t x 0.26 g/t = 2,508 oz vs stored contained=9,000 oz (72.14% BLOCK); 9,000 oz over 300,000 t implies 0.93 g/t Ag. Minella tonnes are solid (indicated 300,000 + inferred 390,000 = total 690,000 exactly; GEO-01 Area 7,900,000 t = Fiama 3,200,000 + GEO-01 Ce
t90a merge: re-homed from the retired 'Minyari Dome' project into 'Minyari'; figures and status unchanged
t90a ledger
QA approve (t90b): print-verified against the p42 image table via two independent vision transcriptions (ops/t90p2-results.txt; corroborated by the p22 map label 'Minella - 29 koz Au, 7 kt Cu, 23 koz Ag, 1.3 kt Co'); the issuer's printed contained column does not cross-foot its own rounded tonnes x grade at this deposit scale - printed figures are canonical. Printed cell: Minella
Cutoff 0.30 g/t Au — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
QA notes:
vision-extracted (page images): QA BLOCK: recomputed contained 13667.2824 oz vs reported 17000 oz (19.60% disagreement)
t89 QA hold (parked): Minella inferred Au unreconcilable: 390,000 t x 1.09 g/t = 13,667 oz vs stored contained=17,000 oz (19.60% BLOCK). Minella tonnes are solid (indicated 300,000 + inferred 390,000 = total 690,000 exactly; GEO-01 Area 7,900,000 t = Fiama 3,200,000 + GEO-01 Central 113,000 + GEO-01 Main Zone 3,300,000 +
t90a merge: re-homed from the retired 'Minyari Dome' project into 'Minyari'; figures and status unchanged
t90a ledger
QA approve (t90b): print-verified against the p42 image table via two independent vision transcriptions (ops/t90p2-results.txt; corroborated by the p22 map label 'Minella - 29 koz Au, 7 kt Cu, 23 koz Ag, 1.3 kt Co'); the issuer's printed contained column does not cross-foot its own rounded tonnes x grade at this deposit scale - printed figures are canonical. Printed cell: Minella
Cutoff 0.30 % Co — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
QA notes:
vision-extracted (page images): QA WARN: cross-category subtotal — this total_resource row on area 'Minella' equals the sum of the same area's indicated+inferred leaves — a per-deposit M&I/P&P-style total (t24 LUN/LUG NI 43-101 class). Policy keeps category leaves + the whole-project Total; adjudicate per the per-property-totals precedent before approval. QA BLOCK: recomputed contained 0.0000 t Co vs reported 1300 t Co (100.00% disagreement)
t89 QA hold (parked): Minella total_resource Co unreconcilable: stored g=0.0000 with contained=1,300 t (100.00% BLOCK). Unlike the other g=0.00 cobalt rows in this table (Fiama 130 t = 0.0041%, GEO-01 Main Zone 70 t = 0.0021%, GEO-01 Central 3 t = 0.0027%, WACA West 5 t = 0.0016%, all genuinely rounding to 0.00 at 2 dp),
t90a merge: re-homed from the retired 'Minyari Dome' project into 'Minyari'; figures and status unchanged
t90a ledger
QA approve (t90b): print-verified against the p42 image table via two independent vision transcriptions (ops/t90p2-results.txt; corroborated by the p22 map label 'Minella - 29 koz Au, 7 kt Cu, 23 koz Ag, 1.3 kt Co'); the issuer's printed contained column does not cross-foot its own rounded tonnes x grade at this deposit scale - printed figures are canonical. Printed cell: Minella
Cutoff 0.30 g/t Ag — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
QA notes:
vision-extracted (page images): QA WARN: mining_area 'Minyari' matches this company's APPROVED standalone project 'Minyari' — hub/satellite double-representation (RMS class): the same deposit exists both as its own project and as an area of 'Minyari Dome'. This hub-shaped row is the better-modeled copy — KEEP it, and retire the standalone 'Minyari' project's overlapping rows instead (they double-count the company total).
t90a merge: re-homed from the retired 'Minyari Dome' project into 'Minyari'; figures and status unchanged
Cutoff 0.30 g/t Au — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
QA notes:
vision-extracted (page images): QA WARN: mining_area 'Minyari' matches this company's APPROVED standalone project 'Minyari' — hub/satellite double-representation (RMS class): the same deposit exists both as its own project and as an area of 'Minyari Dome'. This hub-shaped row is the better-modeled copy — KEEP it, and retire the standalone 'Minyari' project's overlapping rows instead (they double-count the company total). QA INFO: recompute differs 1.27% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±11.84% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled.
t90a merge: re-homed from the retired 'Minyari Dome' project into 'Minyari'; figures and status unchanged
Cutoff 0.30 % Co — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
QA notes:
vision-extracted (page images): QA WARN: cross-category subtotal — this total_resource row on area 'Minyari' equals the sum of the same area's indicated+inferred leaves — a per-deposit M&I/P&P-style total (t24 LUN/LUG NI 43-101 class). Policy keeps category leaves + the whole-project Total; adjudicate per the per-property-totals precedent before approval. QA WARN: mining_area 'Minyari' matches this company's APPROVED standalone project 'Minyari' — hub/satellite double-representation (RMS class): the same deposit exists both as its own project and as an area of 'Minyari Dome'. This hub-shaped row is the better-modeled copy — KEEP it, and retire the standalone 'Minyari' project's overlapping rows instead (they double-count the company total). QA INFO: recompute differs 4.55% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±11.97% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled.
t90a merge: re-homed from the retired 'Minyari Dome' project into 'Minyari'; figures and status unchanged
Cutoff 0.30 g/t Au — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
QA notes:
vision-extracted (page images): QA WARN: 2 rows share this exact identity in this document with CONFLICTING figures (sibling copies: t=27000000.0 g=1.33 conf=0.6). EITHER at most one matches the print (reject the fabricated copies), OR two DISTINCT printed lines collapsed onto one identity because an area label went missing (t63 White Rock: the deposit line and its group Total, both print-exact, on one empty-area key) — then restore the printed label of one copy (FIX mining_area) instead of rejecting — OR the copies come from differently YEAR-HEADED tables of a comparative filing (t67 NEM: every table prints at two year-ends and both copies are print-exact) — then FIX as_at_date to each copy's own table year instead of rejecting — OR both copies are print-exact and collided because a category/classification was mis-mapped (t71 EQX: per-classification Total rows all stored as total_resource) — then FIX category on the mis-mapped copy. QA BLOCK: conflicting duplicate — this (project, mining area, commodity, classification, category, as-at date) appears 2 times in the document WITH DIFFERENT figures. At most one copy matches the print; verify each against the document and reject the rest (a copy whose figures appear nowhere in the text is fabricated). QA INFO: recompute differs 3.55% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±6.09% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled.
t90a: area set to the printed Dome scope so the whole-project area-less slot stays with the 69 Mt statement rows
Cutoff 0.30 % Co — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
QA notes:
vision-extracted (page images): QA WARN: recomputed contained 15300.0000 t Co vs reported 13000 t Co (17.69% disagreement) Rounding-interval overlap exists at the printed granularity, but a 17.69% gap exceeds the 10% interval-waiver ceiling (t23 STM AuEq-miscopy precedent) — verify the printed contained figure before approval.
t90a: area set to the printed Dome scope so the whole-project area-less slot stays with the 69 Mt statement rows
t90a ledger
t90a merge: re-homed from the retired 'Minyari Dome' project into 'Minyari'; figures and status unchanged
Cutoff 0.30 g/t Au — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
QA notes:
vision-extracted (page images): QA INFO: recompute differs 1.83% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±2.98% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled.
t90a merge: re-homed from the retired 'Minyari Dome' project into 'Minyari'; figures and status unchanged
Cutoff 0.40 % Co — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
QA notes:
QA BLOCK: project 'Minyari Dome' matches an approved mining AREA of project 'Minyari' — likely deposit-as-project fragmentation; approving would create a phantom project and double the company rollup. Re-file as (project='Minyari', area='Minyari Dome') or reject. QA INFO: recompute differs 2.17% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained are only good to ±12.09% (rounding granularity) — treated as reconciled.
QA fix: re-filed under the canonical project (Minyari) — the document reports deposits of the 100%-owned Minyari project; deposit label kept as mining_area
Cutoff 0.30 % Co — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
QA notes:
vision-extracted (page images): QA WARN: cross-category subtotal — this total_resource row on area 'Minyari South' equals the sum of the same area's indicated+inferred leaves — a per-deposit M&I/P&P-style total (t24 LUN/LUG NI 43-101 class). Policy keeps category leaves + the whole-project Total; adjudicate per the per-property-totals precedent before approval. QA INFO: recompute differs 1.18% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±9.52% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled.
t90a merge: re-homed from the retired 'Minyari Dome' project into 'Minyari'; figures and status unchanged
Cutoff 0.30 g/t Au — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
QA notes:
vision-extracted (page images): QA INFO: recompute differs 2.01% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±4.92% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled.
t90a merge: re-homed from the retired 'Minyari Dome' project into 'Minyari'; figures and status unchanged
Cutoff 0.30 g/t Au — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
QA notes:
QA INFO: recompute differs 1.59% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained are only good to ±7.50% (rounding granularity) — treated as reconciled.
QA fix: stored 2026-04-22 came from a garbled header (interleaved stale '20 APRIL 2023' template line); doc states only 'April 2026 Mineral Resource Statement' — publication-date fallback
Cutoff 0.30 g/t Ag — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
QA notes:
vision-extracted (page images): QA INFO: recompute differs 1.76% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±7.46% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled.
t90a merge: re-homed from the retired 'Minyari Dome' project into 'Minyari'; figures and status unchanged
Cutoff 0.30 % Co — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
QA notes:
vision-extracted (page images): QA WARN: cross-category subtotal — this total_resource row on area 'Sundown' equals the sum of the same area's indicated+inferred leaves — a per-deposit M&I/P&P-style total (t24 LUN/LUG NI 43-101 class). Policy keeps category leaves + the whole-project Total; adjudicate per the per-property-totals precedent before approval. QA INFO: recompute differs 12.00% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±15.00% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled.
t90a merge: re-homed from the retired 'Minyari Dome' project into 'Minyari'; figures and status unchanged
Cutoff 0.30 g/t Au — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
QA notes:
vision-extracted (page images): QA INFO: recompute differs 2.30% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±11.26% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled.
t90a merge: re-homed from the retired 'Minyari Dome' project into 'Minyari'; figures and status unchanged
Cutoff 0.40 g/t Au — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
QA notes:
QA BLOCK: project 'Minyari Dome' matches an approved mining AREA of project 'Minyari' — likely deposit-as-project fragmentation; approving would create a phantom project and double the company rollup. Re-file as (project='Minyari', area='Minyari Dome') or reject.
QA fix: re-filed under the canonical project (Minyari) — the document reports deposits of the 100%-owned Minyari project; deposit label kept as mining_area
Cutoff 0.30 g/t Ag — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
QA notes:
vision-extracted (page images): QA INFO: recompute differs 4.41% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±6.27% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled.
t90a merge: re-homed from the retired 'Minyari Dome' project into 'Minyari'; figures and status unchanged
Cutoff 0.30 % Co — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
QA notes:
vision-extracted (page images): QA WARN: per-area total_resource row on area 'WACA' beside same-area category leaves — the per-deposit total shape policy rejects (leaves + whole-project Total only). Its tonnes do NOT reconcile with the stored leaves' sum, so a leaf may be corrupted or missing too (t57 LM8: the Upper indicated leaf carried the Total line's figures) — verify every row of this area against the print. QA INFO: recompute differs 8.00% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±12.93% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled.
t90a merge: re-homed from the retired 'Minyari Dome' project into 'Minyari'; figures and status unchanged
Cutoff 0.30 g/t Au — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
QA notes:
vision-extracted (page images): QA INFO: recompute differs 2.15% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±4.40% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled.
t90a merge: re-homed from the retired 'Minyari Dome' project into 'Minyari'; figures and status unchanged
Cutoff 0.40 % Co — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
QA notes:
QA BLOCK: project 'Minyari Dome' matches an approved mining AREA of project 'Minyari' — likely deposit-as-project fragmentation; approving would create a phantom project and double the company rollup. Re-file as (project='Minyari', area='Minyari Dome') or reject. QA INFO: recompute differs 19.70% from the printed contained figure, but the print is exactly consistent with the recompute at the printed tonnes/grade/contained granularity (rounding-interval overlap) — treated as reconciled.
QA fix: re-filed under the canonical project (Minyari) — the document reports deposits of the 100%-owned Minyari project; deposit label kept as mining_area
QA sweep: print-verified
Rows are hierarchical, not additive — do not sum a column across rows. Whole-project rows (Area “Total”) already contain the indented named-area rows beneath them, and an issuer's printed per-deposit total can itself contain other listed areas. All derived totals and rollups on this site already exclude the overlapping rows.
0.95
11,000
0.26
9,000
0.16
2,000
0.005
500" — contained 9,000 oz Ag feeds the printed GEO-01 Area Indicated Ag subtotal 30,000 oz whose printed grade 0.23 g/t is contained-derived (leaf-grade weighting gives 0.132). The 0.26 g/t grade cell is the source defect (300,000 t carrying 9,000 oz implies 0.9331 g/t Ag). Row stands print-faithful. (ops/t96verdicts/a1.txt t96v)
t96v triage
CORRECTION (t98b, re-check 2026-08-06): the t96 annotation round recorded, in this verdict block's header and in the note on sibling 5e06c3bd, that the 2 April 2026 primary announcement was not in the corpus and that the correct grades were printed in no document we hold. Both claims are retracted. The primary announcement IS in the corpus -- source_document 14c7795e, 'Minyari Project Resource Grows to 3.6 Moz Gold Equivalent', published 2026-04-02, 162,762 chars -- and it DOES print the Minella grade column, at 'Table 3f: Minella Deposit Mineral Resource Statement - Breakdown by Oxide State' (p.18) and Table 2 (pp.14-15). Those cells are image-typeset: all 18 of that document's table captions have empty bodies in the text layer (only 4 of 3,555 lines carry >=6 numeric tokens, and all four are prose), so the extractor produced 21 prose-derived rows and zero table rows. The correct grades exist in the statement of record and are one vision pass over pp.14-15 and 18 away; they are simply not transcribable from any text layer we hold today. No figure, as_at or document citation changes on this row -- deriving the grade from tonnes and contained would be a recompute, and printed figures are canonical over recomputes
t98b
QA fix (t98g, ops/t98d_azy_finding.md): COLUMN-SHIFT REPAIR. This row was captured from the conference deck ecc817cc p42, whose Minella block prints its contained cells one metal to the LEFT of their headers — the deck's table omits the Gold Equivalent pair that the primary announcement's Table 2 carries ahead of the gold pair. The stored contained figure 9,000.0000 was the primary's Au ounces. Replaced with the cell the primary actually prints for Ag, from the verbatim line "Minella
Minella Total Indicated Resource
297,100
1.19
11,400
0.95
9,100
0.26
2,500
0.16
500
0.005
20" (14c7795e Table 2, printed p.14 / PDF index 13); tonnage 300,000.0000 -> 297,100 from the same line, and the row is re-pointed to the primary as its source of record. This SUPERSEDES the t96 annotation, which read the printed GRADE column as the defect: the grades are identical in both documents and the contained column is what moved. The reading rests on two independent BLIND vision passes of the primary (ops/t98c, ops/t98f — the second prompted with no expectation and no stored figure, rendered at a different scale) which agree cell-for-cell, and on the deck's OWN printed AuEq formula, which applied to the deck's own printed Minella grades reproduces the deck's 'Au Ounces' cells to 1.7-4.7% while true gold misses by 16.7-21.2%. Every value written here is a printed cell, not a recompute
t98g
1.09
17,000
0.36
14,000
0.21
4,000
0.004
800" — contained 17,000 oz Au is confirmed to the unit by the printed GEO-01 Area Inferred Au subtotal 150,000 oz = 34,000+2,000+80,000+17,000+12,000+5,000; the 1.09 g/t grade cell is the source defect (implied 1.3558 g/t Au). Row stands print-faithful. (ops/t96verdicts/a1.txt t96v)
t96v triage
CORRECTION (t98b, re-check 2026-08-06): the t96 annotation round recorded, in this verdict block's header and in the note on sibling 5e06c3bd, that the 2 April 2026 primary announcement was not in the corpus and that the correct grades were printed in no document we hold. Both claims are retracted. The primary announcement IS in the corpus -- source_document 14c7795e, 'Minyari Project Resource Grows to 3.6 Moz Gold Equivalent', published 2026-04-02, 162,762 chars -- and it DOES print the Minella grade column, at 'Table 3f: Minella Deposit Mineral Resource Statement - Breakdown by Oxide State' (p.18) and Table 2 (pp.14-15). Those cells are image-typeset: all 18 of that document's table captions have empty bodies in the text layer (only 4 of 3,555 lines carry >=6 numeric tokens, and all four are prose), so the extractor produced 21 prose-derived rows and zero table rows. The correct grades exist in the statement of record and are one vision pass over pp.14-15 and 18 away; they are simply not transcribable from any text layer we hold today. No figure, as_at or document citation changes on this row -- deriving the grade from tonnes and contained would be a recompute, and printed figures are canonical over recomputes
t98b
QA fix (t98g, ops/t98d_azy_finding.md): COLUMN-SHIFT REPAIR. This row was captured from the conference deck ecc817cc p42, whose Minella block prints its contained cells one metal to the LEFT of their headers — the deck's table omits the Gold Equivalent pair that the primary announcement's Table 2 carries ahead of the gold pair. The stored contained figure 17,000.0000 was the primary's AuEq (gold-equivalent) ounces. Replaced with the cell the primary actually prints for Au, from the verbatim line "Minella
Minella Inferred Resource
389,300
1.39
17,400
1.09
13,600
0.36
4,400
0.21
800
0.004
10" (14c7795e Table 2, printed p.14 / PDF index 13); tonnage 390,000.0000 -> 389,300 from the same line, and the row is re-pointed to the primary as its source of record. This SUPERSEDES the t96 annotation, which read the printed GRADE column as the defect: the grades are identical in both documents and the contained column is what moved. The reading rests on two independent BLIND vision passes of the primary (ops/t98c, ops/t98f — the second prompted with no expectation and no stored figure, rendered at a different scale) which agree cell-for-cell, and on the deck's OWN printed AuEq formula, which applied to the deck's own printed Minella grades reproduces the deck's 'Au Ounces' cells to 1.7-4.7% while true gold misses by 16.7-21.2%. Every value written here is a printed cell, not a recompute
t98g
1,300 t.
t90b minella
QA annotate (t98b): this row belongs to the AZY Minella printed-grade block and is PRINT-FAITHFUL -- ecc817cc p42 prints 'Minella
Total Mineral Resource
690,000
1.03
29,000
0.31
23,000
0.19
7,000
0.00
1,300', so the stored Co grade 0 is the printed literal '0.00', not a blank and not a dash. The same 2-dp convention appears in the same column for Fiama Total (0.00
130), GEO-01 Main Zone Total (0.00
70) and GEO-01 Central Total (0.00
3) -- a 2-dp Co column cannot print a total below 0.005%. It escaped the t96 detector only because a zero grade yields no ratio, and it needs the same annotation as its eleven siblings rather than a value change
CORRECTION (t98b, re-check 2026-08-06): the t96 annotation round recorded, in this verdict block's header and in the note on sibling 5e06c3bd, that the 2 April 2026 primary announcement was not in the corpus and that the correct grades were printed in no document we hold. Both claims are retracted. The primary announcement IS in the corpus -- source_document 14c7795e, 'Minyari Project Resource Grows to 3.6 Moz Gold Equivalent', published 2026-04-02, 162,762 chars -- and it DOES print the Minella grade column, at 'Table 3f: Minella Deposit Mineral Resource Statement - Breakdown by Oxide State' (p.18) and Table 2 (pp.14-15). Those cells are image-typeset: all 18 of that document's table captions have empty bodies in the text layer (only 4 of 3,555 lines carry >=6 numeric tokens, and all four are prose), so the extractor produced 21 prose-derived rows and zero table rows. The correct grades exist in the statement of record and are one vision pass over pp.14-15 and 18 away; they are simply not transcribable from any text layer we hold today. No figure, as_at or document citation changes on this row -- deriving the grade from tonnes and contained would be a recompute, and printed figures are canonical over recomputes
t98b
QA fix (t98g, ops/t98d_azy_finding.md): COLUMN-SHIFT REPAIR. This row was captured from the conference deck ecc817cc p42, whose Minella block prints its contained cells one metal to the LEFT of their headers — the deck's table omits the Gold Equivalent pair that the primary announcement's Table 2 carries ahead of the gold pair. The stored contained figure 1,300.0000 was the primary's Cu tonnes. Replaced with the cell the primary actually prints for Co, from the verbatim line "Minella
Minella Total Mineral Resource
686,000
1.30
29,000
1.03
23,000
0.31
7,000
0.19
1,000
0.004
30" (14c7795e Table 2, printed p.14 / PDF index 13); tonnage 690,000.0000 -> 686,000 from the same line, and the row is re-pointed to the primary as its source of record. The GRADE also changes, 0.0000 -> 0.004: the deck's 2-dp cobalt column could only print '0.00', while the primary prints three decimals. A precision gain, not a correction. This SUPERSEDES the t96 annotation, which read the printed GRADE column as the defect: the grades are identical in both documents and the contained column is what moved. The reading rests on two independent BLIND vision passes of the primary (ops/t98c, ops/t98f — the second prompted with no expectation and no stored figure, rendered at a different scale) which agree cell-for-cell, and on the deck's OWN printed AuEq formula, which applied to the deck's own printed Minella grades reproduces the deck's 'Au Ounces' cells to 1.7-4.7% while true gold misses by 16.7-21.2%. Every value written here is a printed cell, not a recompute
t98g
t90a ledger
t90a merge: re-homed from the retired 'Minyari Dome' project into 'Minyari'; figures and status unchanged