These choices persist and are added to shared URLs.
Kal East
Western Australia, Australia · Producing · 100.0% ownedManual entry
Current R&R by category
Whole-project rollup at the latest vintage per category: printed project-level rows are preferred, and mining areas are summed (tonnes-weighted grade) only where the issuer prints no project-level row. Per-area and per-source detail in the Current R&R table below.
Category
Tonnes (Mt)
Grade (g/t Au)
Contained (Moz Au)
As at
Measured
0.01 Mt
3.20 g/t
1 koz
29 June 2026
Indicated
10.23 Mt
2.10 g/t
0.69 Moz
29 June 2026
Inferred
12.16 Mt
1.80 g/t
0.69 Moz
29 June 2026
Total Resources
22.41 Mt
1.90 g/t
1.37 Moz
29 June 2026
Proved
—
—
—
—
Probable
3.73 Mt
2.00 g/t
0.24 Moz
29 June 2026
Total Reserves
3.73 Mt
2.00 g/t
0.24 Moz
29 June 2026
Cut-off grade
0.3500 g/t Au
Price assumption
A$2300.00/oz
JORC code year
2012
Peer benchmark — producing Au projects (282 with resources)Resource size P44Resource grade P58View on grade-tonnage chart →
Percentile of this project's current total Resource among covered peers (P100 = largest / highest grade). Basis and Inferred toggles apply.
Unknown code — Reporting code not yet captured for this row.
QA notes:
manual QA insert (tranche 15): extraction missed the printed 'Kal East Resource' project-total line (pairs the stored Kal East reserve rows)
whole-number grade: print says 2.1, stored 2.0 ('Kal East Resource 13 3.2 1 10,230 2.1 2.1 12,162 1.8 686 22,405 1.9 1,372', Appendix E; same class as the 35-row t94b pass — missed by q1 because this row's statement twin 46be36da was rejected, so no HOLD clause cited it; contained 685,000 already correct)
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA WARN: tonnes/contained equal the SUM of 2 sibling row(s) of the same classification/category/commodity (Open Pit, Underground) — likely a printed multi-deposit rollup/subtotal. Policy keeps leaf rows and printed whole-project Totals only; reject mid-level rollups (double-count). QA INFO: recompute differs 3.22% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained are only good to ±6.43% (rounding granularity) — treated as reconciled.
t94b re-home (§C): Appendix E organises the print as Gold Operation -> Mining Centre -> mining method; 'Fingals' is a Mining Centre of the Kal East Gold Operation, not a project. Re-homed to Kal East; the source project name is preserved in mining_area so no leaf identity is lost
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA WARN: tonnes/contained equal the SUM of 2 sibling row(s) of the same classification/category/commodity (Open Pit, Underground) — likely a printed multi-deposit rollup/subtotal. Policy keeps leaf rows and printed whole-project Totals only; reject mid-level rollups (double-count). QA INFO: recompute differs 16.96% from the printed contained figure, but the print is exactly consistent with the recompute at the printed tonnes/grade/contained granularity (rounding-interval overlap) — treated as reconciled.
t94b re-home (§C): Appendix E organises the print as Gold Operation -> Mining Centre -> mining method; 'Fingals' is a Mining Centre of the Kal East Gold Operation, not a project. Re-homed to Kal East; the source project name is preserved in mining_area so no leaf identity is lost
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA INFO: recompute differs 7.27% from the printed contained figure, but the print is exactly consistent with the recompute at the printed tonnes/grade/contained granularity (rounding-interval overlap) — treated as reconciled.
t94b re-home (§C): Appendix E organises the print as Gold Operation -> Mining Centre -> mining method; 'Fingals' is a Mining Centre of the Kal East Gold Operation, not a project. Re-homed to Kal East; the source project name is preserved in mining_area so no leaf identity is lost
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA INFO: recompute differs 5.50% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained are only good to ±6.48% (rounding granularity) — treated as reconciled.
t94b re-home (§C): Appendix E organises the print as Gold Operation -> Mining Centre -> mining method; 'Fingals' is a Mining Centre of the Kal East Gold Operation, not a project. Re-homed to Kal East; the source project name is preserved in mining_area so no leaf identity is lost
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA INFO: recompute differs 24.37% from the printed contained figure, but the print is exactly consistent with the recompute at the printed tonnes/grade/contained granularity (rounding-interval overlap) — treated as reconciled.
t94b re-home (§C): Appendix E organises the print as Gold Operation -> Mining Centre -> mining method; 'Fingals' is a Mining Centre of the Kal East Gold Operation, not a project. Re-homed to Kal East; the source project name is preserved in mining_area so no leaf identity is lost
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA INFO: recompute differs 9.00% from the printed contained figure, but the print is exactly consistent with the recompute at the printed tonnes/grade/contained granularity (rounding-interval overlap) — treated as reconciled.
t94b re-home (§C): Appendix E organises the print as Gold Operation -> Mining Centre -> mining method; 'Fingals' is a Mining Centre of the Kal East Gold Operation, not a project. Re-homed to Kal East; the source project name is preserved in mining_area so no leaf identity is lost
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA INFO: recompute differs 11.29% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained are only good to ±10.70% (rounding granularity) — treated as reconciled.
t94b re-home (§C): Appendix E organises the print as Gold Operation -> Mining Centre -> mining method; 'Fingals' is a Mining Centre of the Kal East Gold Operation, not a project. Re-homed to Kal East; the source project name is preserved in mining_area so no leaf identity is lost
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA INFO: recompute differs 6.69% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained are only good to ±7.32% (rounding granularity) — treated as reconciled.
t94b re-home (§C): Appendix E organises the print as Gold Operation -> Mining Centre -> mining method; 'Fingals' is a Mining Centre of the Kal East Gold Operation, not a project. Re-homed to Kal East; the source project name is preserved in mining_area so no leaf identity is lost
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA INFO: recompute differs 8.49% from the printed contained figure, but the print is exactly consistent with the recompute at the printed tonnes/grade/contained granularity (rounding-interval overlap) — treated as reconciled.
t94b re-home (§C): Appendix E organises the print as Gold Operation -> Mining Centre -> mining method; 'Fingals' is a Mining Centre of the Kal East Gold Operation, not a project. Re-homed to Kal East; the source project name is preserved in mining_area so no leaf identity is lost
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA WARN: tonnes/contained equal the SUM of 2 sibling row(s) of the same classification/category/commodity (Open Pit, Underground) — likely a printed multi-deposit rollup/subtotal. Policy keeps leaf rows and printed whole-project Totals only; reject mid-level rollups (double-count). QA INFO: recompute differs 9.69% from the printed contained figure, but the print is exactly consistent with the recompute at the printed tonnes/grade/contained granularity (rounding-interval overlap) — treated as reconciled.
t94b re-home (§C): Appendix E organises the print as Gold Operation -> Mining Centre -> mining method; 'Majestic' is a Mining Centre of the Kal East Gold Operation, not a project. Re-homed to Kal East; the source project name is preserved in mining_area so no leaf identity is lost
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA WARN: tonnes/contained equal the SUM of 2 sibling row(s) of the same classification/category/commodity (Open Pit, Underground) — likely a printed multi-deposit rollup/subtotal. Policy keeps leaf rows and printed whole-project Totals only; reject mid-level rollups (double-count). QA INFO: recompute differs 19.66% from the printed contained figure, but the print is exactly consistent with the recompute at the printed tonnes/grade/contained granularity (rounding-interval overlap) — treated as reconciled.
t94b re-home (§C): Appendix E organises the print as Gold Operation -> Mining Centre -> mining method; 'Majestic' is a Mining Centre of the Kal East Gold Operation, not a project. Re-homed to Kal East; the source project name is preserved in mining_area so no leaf identity is lost
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA INFO: recompute differs 3.29% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained are only good to ±6.97% (rounding granularity) — treated as reconciled.
t94b re-home (§C): Appendix E organises the print as Gold Operation -> Mining Centre -> mining method; 'Majestic' is a Mining Centre of the Kal East Gold Operation, not a project. Re-homed to Kal East; the source project name is preserved in mining_area so no leaf identity is lost
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA INFO: recompute differs 28.89% from the printed contained figure, but the print is exactly consistent with the recompute at the printed tonnes/grade/contained granularity (rounding-interval overlap) — treated as reconciled.
t94b re-home (§C): Appendix E organises the print as Gold Operation -> Mining Centre -> mining method; 'Majestic' is a Mining Centre of the Kal East Gold Operation, not a project. Re-homed to Kal East; the source project name is preserved in mining_area so no leaf identity is lost
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA INFO: recompute differs 25.02% from the printed contained figure, but the print is exactly consistent with the recompute at the printed tonnes/grade/contained granularity (rounding-interval overlap) — treated as reconciled.
t94b re-home (§C): Appendix E organises the print as Gold Operation -> Mining Centre -> mining method; 'Majestic' is a Mining Centre of the Kal East Gold Operation, not a project. Re-homed to Kal East; the source project name is preserved in mining_area so no leaf identity is lost
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA INFO: recompute differs 30.34% from the printed contained figure, but the print is exactly consistent with the recompute at the printed tonnes/grade/contained granularity (rounding-interval overlap) — treated as reconciled.
t94b re-home (§C): Appendix E organises the print as Gold Operation -> Mining Centre -> mining method; 'Majestic' is a Mining Centre of the Kal East Gold Operation, not a project. Re-homed to Kal East; the source project name is preserved in mining_area so no leaf identity is lost
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA INFO: recompute differs 7.88% from the printed contained figure, but the print is exactly consistent with the recompute at the printed tonnes/grade/contained granularity (rounding-interval overlap) — treated as reconciled.
t94b re-home (§C): Appendix E organises the print as Gold Operation -> Mining Centre -> mining method; 'Majestic' is a Mining Centre of the Kal East Gold Operation, not a project. Re-homed to Kal East; the source project name is preserved in mining_area so no leaf identity is lost
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA INFO: recompute differs 8.51% from the printed contained figure, but the print is exactly consistent with the recompute at the printed tonnes/grade/contained granularity (rounding-interval overlap) — treated as reconciled.
t94b re-home (§C): Appendix E organises the print as Gold Operation -> Mining Centre -> mining method; 'Majestic' is a Mining Centre of the Kal East Gold Operation, not a project. Re-homed to Kal East; the source project name is preserved in mining_area so no leaf identity is lost
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA INFO: recompute differs 9.65% from the printed contained figure, but the print is exactly consistent with the recompute at the printed tonnes/grade/contained granularity (rounding-interval overlap) — treated as reconciled.
t94b re-home (§C): Appendix E organises the print as Gold Operation -> Mining Centre -> mining method; 'Majestic' is a Mining Centre of the Kal East Gold Operation, not a project. Re-homed to Kal East; the source project name is preserved in mining_area so no leaf identity is lost
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA WARN: tonnes/contained equal the SUM of 2 sibling row(s) of the same classification/category/commodity (Open Pit, Underground) — likely a printed multi-deposit rollup/subtotal. Policy keeps leaf rows and printed whole-project Totals only; reject mid-level rollups (double-count). QA INFO: recompute differs 1.14% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained are only good to ±10.57% (rounding granularity) — treated as reconciled. [t31f-rehome 2026-07-25: moved from standalone project 'Myhree' to hub 'Kal East' as area 'Myhree' — hub-satellite re-home, figures unchanged. See ops/t31f-rehome-results.txt.]
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA WARN: tonnes/contained equal the SUM of 2 sibling row(s) of the same classification/category/commodity (Open Pit, Underground) — likely a printed multi-deposit rollup/subtotal. Policy keeps leaf rows and printed whole-project Totals only; reject mid-level rollups (double-count). QA INFO: recompute differs 15.97% from the printed contained figure, but the print is exactly consistent with the recompute at the printed tonnes/grade/contained granularity (rounding-interval overlap) — treated as reconciled. [t31f-rehome 2026-07-25: moved from standalone project 'Myhree' to hub 'Kal East' as area 'Myhree' — hub-satellite re-home, figures unchanged. See ops/t31f-rehome-results.txt.]
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA INFO: recompute differs 9.20% from the printed contained figure, but the print is exactly consistent with the recompute at the printed tonnes/grade/contained granularity (rounding-interval overlap) — treated as reconciled. [t31f-rehome 2026-07-25: moved from standalone project 'Myhree' to hub 'Kal East' as area 'Myhree' — hub-satellite re-home, figures unchanged. See ops/t31f-rehome-results.txt.]
t88 swarm r2 (a9): t88 F3 pass: Myhree total 3,238kt/286koz = Myhree OP 2,084kt/150koz + Myhree UG 1,154kt/136koz, and each Myhree leaf cross-foots exactly across measured/indicated/inferred, so the figures are sound. Label check for any print probe: doc 14dab933 is titled 'Trojan & Imperial Resources Increase to 286oz' and this area='Myhree' total is exactly 286koz - verify the deposit column was not mis-labelled on the printed resource table.
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA INFO: recompute differs 12.15% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained are only good to ±12.58% (rounding granularity) — treated as reconciled. [t31f-rehome 2026-07-25: moved from standalone project 'Myhree' to hub 'Kal East' as area 'Myhree Open Pit' — hub-satellite re-home, figures unchanged. See ops/t31f-rehome-results.txt.]
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA INFO: recompute differs 7.24% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained are only good to ±6.82% (rounding granularity) — treated as reconciled. [t31f-rehome 2026-07-25: moved from standalone project 'Myhree' to hub 'Kal East' as area 'Myhree Open Pit' — hub-satellite re-home, figures unchanged. See ops/t31f-rehome-results.txt.]
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA INFO: recompute differs 10.66% from the printed contained figure, but the print is exactly consistent with the recompute at the printed tonnes/grade/contained granularity (rounding-interval overlap) — treated as reconciled. [t31f-rehome 2026-07-25: moved from standalone project 'Myhree' to hub 'Kal East' as area 'Myhree Open Pit' — hub-satellite re-home, figures unchanged. See ops/t31f-rehome-results.txt.]
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA INFO: recompute differs 8.75% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained are only good to ±9.64% (rounding granularity) — treated as reconciled. [t31f-rehome 2026-07-25: moved from standalone project 'Myhree' to hub 'Kal East' as area 'Myhree Underground' — hub-satellite re-home, figures unchanged. See ops/t31f-rehome-results.txt.]
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA INFO: recompute differs 12.63% from the printed contained figure, but the print is exactly consistent with the recompute at the printed tonnes/grade/contained granularity (rounding-interval overlap) — treated as reconciled. [t31f-rehome 2026-07-25: moved from standalone project 'Myhree' to hub 'Kal East' as area 'Myhree Underground' — hub-satellite re-home, figures unchanged. See ops/t31f-rehome-results.txt.]
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA INFO: recompute differs 9.12% from the printed contained figure, but the print is exactly consistent with the recompute at the printed tonnes/grade/contained granularity (rounding-interval overlap) — treated as reconciled. [t31f-rehome 2026-07-25: moved from standalone project 'Myhree' to hub 'Kal East' as area 'Myhree Underground' — hub-satellite re-home, figures unchanged. See ops/t31f-rehome-results.txt.]
QA INFO: inclusive-of-reserves flag cleared on an inferred row — reserves derive from M&I only, so the flag is meaningless on inferred. QA WARN: rollup-shaped area label ('Other Sub Total') — likely a printed multi-deposit subtotal; policy keeps leaf rows and printed whole-project Totals only. QA WARN: tonnes/contained equal the SUM of 2 already-APPROVED row(s) of the same project/classification/category/commodity (Other Open Pit, Other Underground) — a cross-document rollup whose component leaves were stored from another announcement (t58 CMM MGGP underground class). Approving it double-counts against the approved leaves; verify whether the print is a grouping line. QA WARN: tonnes AND contained match an approved estimate of this company filed under a DIFFERENT identity (project 'Kal East', area 'Other') — likely a cross-project re-presentation / umbrella-alias copy of that estimate; keep one operative copy under the established filing. QA WARN: identical figure to approved history under a DIFFERENT label ('Kal East'/'Other') — likely the same estimate re-presented with a renamed project/area (alias or labelling drift). Reject as a duplicate unless this is genuinely a different deposit. QA WARN: mining_area 'Other Sub Total' looks like a table SUBTOTAL line, not a leaf area — approving it alongside the leaf areas double-counts. Reject it (or reject the leaves) before approval. QA WARN: identical tonnes AND contained to an APPROVED row of the same project/category/vintage under a DIFFERENT area label (approved area='Other', this row area='Other Sub Total') — an area-relabelled re-presentation (live t52: Ahafo North / Brucejack, six rows). The approved identity is the vetted one: reject this copy rather than approving it; clearing the label would mint an exact duplicate.
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA WARN: cross-category subtotal — this total_resource row on area 'Other Sub Total' equals the sum of the same area's indicated+inferred leaves — a per-deposit M&I/P&P-style total (t24 LUN/LUG NI 43-101 class). Policy keeps category leaves + the whole-project Total; adjudicate per the per-property-totals precedent before approval. QA WARN: rollup-shaped area label ('Other Sub Total') — likely a printed multi-deposit subtotal; policy keeps leaf rows and printed whole-project Totals only. QA WARN: tonnes/contained equal the SUM of 2 already-APPROVED row(s) of the same project/classification/category/commodity (Other Open Pit, Other Underground) — a cross-document rollup whose component leaves were stored from another announcement (t58 CMM MGGP underground class). Approving it double-counts against the approved leaves; verify whether the print is a grouping line. QA WARN: tonnes AND contained match an approved estimate of this company filed under a DIFFERENT identity (project 'Kal East', area 'Other') — likely a cross-project re-presentation / umbrella-alias copy of that estimate; keep one operative copy under the established filing. QA WARN: identical figure to approved history under a DIFFERENT label ('Kal East'/'Other') — likely the same estimate re-presented with a renamed project/area (alias or labelling drift). Reject as a duplicate unless this is genuinely a different deposit. QA WARN: mining_area 'Other Sub Total' looks like a table SUBTOTAL line, not a leaf area — approving it alongside the leaf areas double-counts. Reject it (or reject the leaves) before approval. QA INFO: recompute differs 1.49% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±7.60% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled. QA WARN: identical tonnes AND contained to an APPROVED row of the same project/category/vintage under a DIFFERENT area label (approved area='Other', this row area='Other Sub Total') — an area-relabelled re-presentation (live t52: Ahafo North / Brucejack, six rows). The approved identity is the vetted one: reject this copy rather than approving it; clearing the label would mint an exact duplicate.
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA INFO: recompute differs 25.39% from the printed contained figure, but the print is exactly consistent with the recompute at the printed tonnes/grade/contained granularity (rounding-interval overlap) — treated as reconciled. QA INFO: identical figures to area(s) 'Other' — likely the same printed line under two labels (a summary and a detail table); keep one label and reject the other.
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA INFO: recompute differs 12.99% from the printed contained figure, but the print is exactly consistent with the recompute at the printed tonnes/grade/contained granularity (rounding-interval overlap) — treated as reconciled. QA INFO: identical figures to area(s) 'Other' — likely the same printed line under two labels (a summary and a detail table); keep one label and reject the other.
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA INFO: recompute differs 16.13% from the printed contained figure, but the print is exactly consistent with the recompute at the printed tonnes/grade/contained granularity (rounding-interval overlap) — treated as reconciled.
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA INFO: recompute differs 17.54% from the printed contained figure, but the print is exactly consistent with the recompute at the printed tonnes/grade/contained granularity (rounding-interval overlap) — treated as reconciled.
Cutoff 0.35 g/t Au — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
t94b re-home (§C): Appendix E organises the print as Gold Operation -> Mining Centre -> mining method; 'Trojan' is a Mining Centre of the Kal East Gold Operation, not a project. Re-homed to Kal East; the source project name is preserved in mining_area so no leaf identity is lost
Cutoff 0.35 g/t Au — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA INFO: recompute differs 4.15% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained are only good to ±5.31% (rounding granularity) — treated as reconciled.
t94b re-home (§C): Appendix E organises the print as Gold Operation -> Mining Centre -> mining method; 'Trojan' is a Mining Centre of the Kal East Gold Operation, not a project. Re-homed to Kal East; the source project name is preserved in mining_area so no leaf identity is lost
Cutoff 0.35 g/t Au — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA INFO: recompute differs 2.96% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained are only good to ±4.93% (rounding granularity) — treated as reconciled.
t94b re-home (§C): Appendix E organises the print as Gold Operation -> Mining Centre -> mining method; 'Trojan' is a Mining Centre of the Kal East Gold Operation, not a project. Re-homed to Kal East; the source project name is preserved in mining_area so no leaf identity is lost
@ A$ 2,300/oz — Metal price assumption used to derive this estimate.
QA notes:
QA WARN: tonnes/contained equal the SUM of 2 sibling row(s) of the same classification/category/commodity (Open Pits, Underground) — likely a printed multi-deposit rollup/subtotal. Policy keeps leaf rows and printed whole-project Totals only; reject mid-level rollups (double-count). QA INFO: recompute differs 1.43% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained are only good to ±2.72% (rounding granularity) — treated as reconciled.
Rows are hierarchical, not additive — do not sum a column across rows. Whole-project rows (Area “Total”) already contain the indented named-area rows beneath them, and an issuer's printed per-deposit total can itself contain other listed areas. All derived totals and rollups on this site already exclude the overlapping rows.
Dotted Total-row tonnes/grade are derived under the active Resources treatment: tonnes netted of (or grossed by) the reserve tonnage alongside contained, grade re-derived as netted contained ÷ netted tonnes — not the published figures.
† Total-row tonnes/grade as published (not net): the reserve statement prints no tonnage to net out, so only the contained figure honours the Resources treatment there.
QA approve (t93v q1): as_at_date: '2026-07-16' -> '2026-06-29'; mining_area: 'Other Sub Total' -> 'Other'. printed Appendix E Kal East 'Other / Sub Total' Inferred 926kt @ 2.5g/t Au for 75koz (= Other Open Pit 913/70 + Other Underground 13/5, exact). AUTHORITY: only live twin is approved a3251428 (Kal East/'Other'), a t89 DECK row on 2026-07-16; the ASX statement outranks the deck so the statement copy is kept, dated to the 2026-06-29 vintage of record and relabelled to the book's vetted area name 'Other' (AREA-RELABEL-t52 resolved in favour of the approved LABEL, not the approved ROW). SUM-OF-APPROVED-LEAVES / ROLLUP-LABEL / SUBTOTAL-LABEL warns adjudicated: BC8's book already stores mining-centre sub-totals beside their leaves at this vintage (approved cb81b33b 'Myhree' 1,230kt beside Myhree Open Pit 1,000kt + Myhree Underground 230kt), so the 'Other' sub-total is consistent, not a double-count. RE-POINT: retire/re-point approved a3251428 @2026-07-16.
t93v q1
QA approve (t93v q1): as_at_date: '2026-07-16' -> '2026-06-29'; mining_area: 'Other Sub Total' -> 'Other'. printed Appendix E Kal East 'Other / Sub Total' Total line 1,103kt @ 2.5g/t Au for 90koz (= Other Open Pit 1,090/85 + Other Underground 13/5, exact). AUTHORITY: only live twin is approved 1872e390 (Kal East/'Other'), a t89 DECK row on 2026-07-16; ASX statement outranks the deck — statement copy kept, dated 2026-06-29, relabelled to the vetted area name 'Other'. XPROJ-ALIAS / ROLLUP-LABEL / SUBTOTAL-LABEL warns adjudicated as for the inferred twin (Myhree sub-total precedent). RE-POINT: retire/re-point approved 1872e390 @2026-07-16.
t93v q1
· published 29 June 2026
Ref: 13
JORC 2012 — Reporting code of record: JORC 2012
@ A$ 2,300/oz — Metal price assumption used to derive this estimate.
QA notes:
QA INFO: recompute differs 1.43% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained are only good to ±2.72% (rounding granularity) — treated as reconciled.
JORC 2012 — Reporting code of record: JORC 2012
@ A$ 2,300/oz — Metal price assumption used to derive this estimate.
QA notes:
QA INFO: recompute differs 3.55% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained are only good to ±13.50% (rounding granularity) — treated as reconciled.
JORC 2012 — Reporting code of record: JORC 2012
@ A$ 2,300/oz — Metal price assumption used to derive this estimate.
QA notes:
QA INFO: recompute differs 3.55% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained are only good to ±13.50% (rounding granularity) — treated as reconciled.
@ A$ 2,300/oz — Metal price assumption used to derive this estimate.
QA notes:
QA BLOCK: recomputed contained 42053.1765 oz vs reported 46000 oz (8.58% disagreement)
QA note: printed line is internally inconsistent — 545 kt x 2.4 g/t recomputes to 42.1 koz vs printed 46 koz (~9%, beyond rounding granularity); both printed values kept as-is
QA annotate (t98v, a5.txt): Appendix C prints "Myhree Open Pit - - - 545 2.4 46 545 2.4 46". Full rounding credit on all three cells still leaves the row open: t x g gives 41,139-42,969 oz against a printed-ounce band of 45,500-46,500 (5.9% short). Tonnes and ounces are corroborated by the printed open-pit sub-total in the same table ("Sub total Open Pits - - - 3,288 1.8 193": 545+120+2,623=3,288 and 46+6+141=193), so the 2.4 g/t grade cell is the outlier (46koz/545kt implies 2.63 g/t). The same appendix carries an independent typo — "Other Open Pits ... 2,623 1.7 141
2,584 1.7 142", where the Total-Reserve tonnage 2,584 contradicts the 3,288 sub-total it feeds — so sloppy cells in this table are demonstrated, not assumed. No FIX: 2.63 is a recompute.
t98v
· published 29 June 2026
Ref: 13
JORC 2012 — Reporting code of record: JORC 2012
@ A$ 2,300/oz — Metal price assumption used to derive this estimate.
QA notes:
QA BLOCK: recomputed contained 42053.1765 oz vs reported 46000 oz (8.58% disagreement)
QA note: printed line is internally inconsistent — 545 kt x 2.4 g/t recomputes to 42.1 koz vs printed 46 koz (~9%, beyond rounding granularity); both printed values kept as-is
QA annotate (t98v, a5.txt): Same printed line, Total Reserve column ("Myhree Open Pit ... 545 2.4 46"); identical finding and identical corroboration to 462a7a57. Row stands as the faithful capture of an internally inconsistent print.
t98v
JORC 2012 — Reporting code of record: JORC 2012
@ A$ 2,300/oz — Metal price assumption used to derive this estimate.
QA notes:
QA INFO: recompute differs 1.68% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained are only good to ±3.31% (rounding granularity) — treated as reconciled.
Ref: 13
JORC 2012 — Reporting code of record: JORC 2012
@ A$ 2,300/oz — Metal price assumption used to derive this estimate.
QA notes:
QA fix: printed Total column (2,584 kt / 142 koz) is internally inconsistent with the same line's Probable column and the Sub total arithmetic (545+120+2,623=3,288; 46+6+141=193) — normalized to the provable 2,623 kt / 141 koz
JORC 2012 — Reporting code of record: JORC 2012
@ A$ 2,300/oz — Metal price assumption used to derive this estimate.
QA notes:
QA INFO: recompute differs 1.16% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained are only good to ±7.50% (rounding granularity) — treated as reconciled.
JORC 2012 — Reporting code of record: JORC 2012
@ A$ 2,300/oz — Metal price assumption used to derive this estimate.
QA notes:
QA INFO: recompute differs 1.16% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained are only good to ±7.50% (rounding granularity) — treated as reconciled.