View settings100% · M+I+I · Resources excl. reserves · Native commodities

Reporting assumptions

These choices persist and are added to shared URLs.

Ownership basis

Show the full project inventory before ownership adjustment.

Display scale

Display contained quantities in millions of ounces or tonnes.

Resource treatment

Normalise Resources to exclude Reserves: where a project is flagged inclusive, net Reserves out of Resources so the figure is additional Resources beyond Reserves. Unknown-convention rows are shown as stated.

Resource total

Total Resource includes Inferred (JORC convention). Totals are re-derived from category rows wherever the document discloses them.

Recovery basis

Show the issuer's headline recoverable figure as reported. Lithium-brine reserves already have the brine-processing recovery factor applied; everything else is shown as stated.

Commodity view

Primary view: each commodity in its own contained unit (oz / t).

Pickle Crow

Ontario, Canada · Exploring · 80.0% ownedUnverified

Current R&R by category

Whole-project rollup at the latest vintage per category: printed project-level rows are preferred, and mining areas are summed (tonnes-weighted grade) only where the issuer prints no project-level row. Per-area and per-source detail in the Current R&R table below.

Category	Tonnes (Mt)	Grade (g/t Au)	Contained (Moz Au)	As at
Measured	—	—	—	—
Indicated	—	—	—	—
Inferred	11.90 Mt	7.20 g/t	2.80 Moz	04 May 2023
Total Resources	11.90 Mt	7.20 g/t	2.80 Moz	04 May 2023
Proved	—	—	—	—
Probable	—	—	—	—
Total Reserves	—	—	—	—

Cut-off grade

2.0000 g/t Au · 3.0000 g/t Au

Price assumption

—

JORC code year

2012

Peer benchmark — exploring Au projects (297 with resources)Resource size P86Resource grade P94View on grade-tonnage chart →

Percentile of this project's current total Resource among covered peers (P100 = largest / highest grade). Basis and Inferred toggles apply.

Data quality

Latest source: BVR Diggers and Dealers Presentation 2026 · 04 May 2023
Reporting code: JORC 2012
Convention: unknown
Currency assumption: A$
Disagreement flags: 3 rows

Current R&R

Resources

Area	Category	Tonnes (Mt)	Au		As at	Source	Provenance
Area	Category	Tonnes (Mt)	Grade (g/t Au)	Contained (Moz Au)	As at	Source	Provenance
Total	Inferred	11.90 Mt	7.20 g/t	2.80 Moz	04 May 2023	21Unverified Evidence record Pickle Crow Inferred · Au · as at 2023-05-04 Reported figure Area Whole project Basis 100% Ore tonnes (t) 11900000.0000 Grade 7.2000 Contained (oz) 2800000.0000 Classification Resource Source trail BVR Diggers and Dealers Presentation 2026 21 Published 2026-08-05 Verification Approved; not independently verified · Model extracted QA INFO: recompute differs 1.62% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±2.90% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled. \| QA fix+approve (t100v, q5.txt): as_at_date=2023-05-04. Figures OK: p.21 "TOTAL 11.9 7.2 2.8" — a printed total line, corroborated three more times in the deck ("2.7Moz @ 7.2g/t Au existing Mineral Resource" p.5, "2.8Moz @ 7.2g/t Gold Resource" p.7, "At 2.8Moz @ 7.2g/t, Pickle Crow is one of the Highest-Grade undeveloped gold" p.18). Printed rollup reconciles with its printed leaves within one print step: 6.7+4.2+1.0 = 11.9 Mt exactly and 2.1+0.5+0.1 = 2.7 vs printed 2.8 Moz at the table's declared 0.1 Moz / one-significant-figure granularity. Totals and leaves both stand. Same date fix. \| t100v Copies a pre-filled issue record so you can send it through your normal channel.

Bulk (BIF, Porphyry)

Inferred

4.20 Mt

3.80 g/t

0.50 Moz

04 May 2023

21Unverified

notes (9)

Source: BVR Diggers and Dealers Presentation 2026 · published 05 Aug 2026

Ref: 21

JORC 2012 — Reporting code of record: JORC 2012
Cutoff 2.00 g/t Au — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.

QA notes:

QA INFO: recompute differs 2.63% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±8.51% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled.
QA fix+approve (t100v, q5.txt): as_at_date=2023-05-04. Figures OK: p.21 "APPENDIX 1 - PICKLE CROW GOLD PROJECT / Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate1 ... Bulk (BIF, Porphyry) 2.0g/t 4.2 3.8 0.5" under "Mineralisation Domain
Lower Cut-off
Tonnes (Mt)
Gold Grade (g/t)
Gold (Moz)" — 4,200,000t, 3.8 g/t, 500,000oz, all printed cells. The stored as_at 2023-01-01 is a year-only fallback, not a printed date: the deck names the vintage twice — p.10 "Long Projection shows 2023 Mineral Resource Estimate" and p.11 "2023 MRE conducted at US$1,850/oz Au" — and prints the originating release in the Appendix 2 source list as "5. FireFly Metals/AuTECO Minerals (ASX:FFM) ASX Release 04/05/2023 'High-Grade Inferred Gold Resource Grows to 2.8Moz at 7.2g/t'", whose headline 2.8Moz @ 7.2g/t is character-for-character the TOTAL line of this very table. Dates in that list are unambiguously DD/MM (18/11/2025, 24/03/2023, 24/2/2023), so 04/05/2023 = 4 May 2023. Recompute reconciliation adjudicated: fine — the table's own note says "all resource numbers are reported to one significant figure and may not add up due to rounding".

Satellite (East Pat, Cohen Mac)

Inferred

1.00 Mt

4.10 g/t

0.10 Moz

04 May 2023

21Unverified

notes (5)

Source: BVR Diggers and Dealers Presentation 2026 · published 05 Aug 2026

Ref: 21

JORC 2012 — Reporting code of record: JORC 2012
Cutoff 2.00 g/t Au — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.

QA notes:

QA INFO: recompute differs 31.82% from the printed contained figure, but the print is exactly consistent with the recompute at the printed tonnes/grade/contained granularity (rounding-interval overlap) — treated as reconciled.
QA fix+approve (t100v, q5.txt): as_at_date=2023-05-04. Figures OK: p.21 "Satellite (East Pat, Cohen Mac) 2.0g/t 1.0 4.1 0.1" — 1,000,000t, 4.1 g/t, 100,000oz, printed verbatim. The 31.82% recompute gap (1.0Mt x 4.1g/t = 131,833oz vs printed 0.1Moz) is entirely the table's declared one-significant-figure convention — "Note that all resource numbers are reported to one significant figure and may not add up due to rounding" — so the printed 0.1 Moz stands. Same date fix.
t100v