Loading…
These choices persist and are added to shared URLs.
Whole-project rollup at the latest vintage per category: printed project-level rows are preferred, and mining areas are summed (tonnes-weighted grade) only where the issuer prints no project-level row. Per-area and per-source detail in the Current R&R table below.
| Category | Tonnes (Mt) | Grade (g/t Au) | Contained (Moz Au) | As at |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Measured | 4.75 Mt | 0.14 g/t | 0.02 Moz | 30 Sept 2025 |
| Indicated | 5.38 Mt | 0.23 g/t | 0.04 Moz | 30 Sept 2025 |
| Inferred | 11.74 Mt | 0.16 g/t | 0.06 Moz | 30 Sept 2025 |
| Total Resources | 14.10 Mt | 0.14 g/t | 0.06 Moz | 30 Sept 2025 |
| Proved | 1.80 Mt | 0.16 g/t | 0.01 Moz | 01 July 2025 |
| Probable | 2.20 Mt | 0.28 g/t | 0.02 Moz | 01 July 2025 |
| Total Reserves | 4.00 Mt | 0.22 g/t | 0.03 Moz | 01 July 2025 |
Sub-category rows are as disclosed (no Reserves-treatment netting); the Total rows honour the Resources treatment and Inferred-policy toggles, so components may not sum to the Total.
Dotted tonnes/grade are derived under the active Resources treatment: tonnes are netted of (or grossed by) the reserve tonnage alongside contained, and grade is re-derived as netted contained ÷ netted tonnes — not the published figures.
| Category | Tonnes (Mt) | Grade (g/t Ag) | Contained (Moz Ag) | As at |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Measured | 4.75 Mt | 2.65 g/t | 0.41 Moz | 30 Sept 2025 |
| Indicated | 5.38 Mt | 2.27 g/t | 0.39 Moz | 30 Sept 2025 |
| Inferred | 11.74 Mt | 2.13 g/t | 0.80 Moz | 30 Sept 2025 |
| Total Resources | 13.97 Mt | 2.20 g/t | 0.99 Moz | 30 Sept 2025 |
| Proved |
| Category | Tonnes (Mt) | Grade (% Cu) | Contained (Mt Cu) | As at |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Measured | 4.75 Mt | 0.80% | 0.04 Mt Cu | 30 Sept 2025 |
| Indicated | 5.38 Mt | 0.73% | 0.04 Mt Cu | 30 Sept 2025 |
| Inferred | 11.74 Mt | 0.71% | 0.08 Mt Cu | 30 Sept 2025 |
| Total Resources | 14.10 Mt | 0.65% | 0.09 Mt Cu | 30 Sept 2025 |
| Proved |
Percentile of this project's current total Resource among covered peers (P100 = largest / highest grade). Basis and Inferred toggles apply.
| Area | Category | Tonnes (Mt) | Au | Ag | Cu | As at | Source | Provenance | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade (g/t Au) | Contained (Moz Au) | Grade (g/t Ag) | Contained (Moz Ag) | Grade (% Cu) | Contained (Mt Cu) | ||||||
| Total | Total Resources | 13.97–14.10 Mt | |||||||||
| 2.60 g/t |
| 0.15 Moz |
| 01 July 2025 |
| Probable | 2.20 Mt | 2.30 g/t | 0.16 Moz | 01 July 2025 |
| Total Reserves | 4.00 Mt | 2.40 g/t | 0.31 Moz | 01 July 2025 |
Sub-category rows are as disclosed (no Reserves-treatment netting); the Total rows honour the Resources treatment and Inferred-policy toggles, so components may not sum to the Total.
Dotted tonnes/grade are derived under the active Resources treatment: tonnes are netted of (or grossed by) the reserve tonnage alongside contained, and grade is re-derived as netted contained ÷ netted tonnes — not the published figures.
| 0.92% |
| 0.02 Mt Cu |
| 01 July 2025 |
| Probable | 2.20 Mt | 0.79% | 0.02 Mt Cu | 01 July 2025 |
| Total Reserves | 4.00 Mt | 0.85% | 0.03 Mt Cu | 01 July 2025 |
Sub-category rows are as disclosed (no Reserves-treatment netting); the Total rows honour the Resources treatment and Inferred-policy toggles, so components may not sum to the Total.
Dotted tonnes/grade are derived under the active Resources treatment: tonnes are netted of (or grossed by) the reserve tonnage alongside contained, and grade is re-derived as netted contained ÷ netted tonnes — not the published figures.
| 0.06 Moz |
| 2.20 g/t | 0.99 Moz |
| 0.65% | 0.09 Mt Cu |
| 30 Sept 2025 |
| 3Unverified |
notes (5)Ref: 3
QA notes:
|
| Emily Star | Inferred | 2.60 Mt | 0.08 g/t | 0.01 Moz | 1.60 g/t | 0.13 Moz | 0.77% | 0.02 Mt Cu | 30 Sept 2025 | 3Unverified | notes (4)Ref: 3
QA notes:
|
| Emily Star | Total Resources | 2.60 Mt † | 0.08 g/t † | 0.00 Moz | — | — | 0.77% † | 0.00 Mt Cu | 30 Sept 2025 | 3Unverified | notes (5)Ref: 3
QA notes:
|
| Kavanagh (including Spitfire) | Measured | 4.20 Mt | 0.11 g/t | 0.02 Moz | 2.70 g/t | 0.36 Moz | 0.80% | 0.03 Mt Cu | 30 Sept 2025 | 3Unverified | notes (4)Ref: 3
QA notes:
|
| Kavanagh (including Spitfire) | Indicated | 2.70 Mt | 0.13 g/t | 0.01 Moz | 2.50 g/t | 0.22 Moz | 0.72% | 0.02 Mt Cu | 30 Sept 2025 | 3Unverified | notes (5)Ref: 3
QA notes:
|
| Kavanagh (including Spitfire) | Inferred | 5.80 Mt | 0.14 g/t | 0.03 Moz | 2.50 g/t | 0.47 Moz | 0.65% | 0.04 Mt Cu | 30 Sept 2025 | 3Unverified | notes (4)Ref: 3
QA notes:
|
| Kavanagh (including Spitfire) | Total Resources | 4.80 Mt | 0.00 g/t | 0.00 Moz | — | — | 0.48% | 0.02 Mt Cu | 30 Sept 2025 | 3Unverified | notes (4)Ref: 3
QA notes:
|
| North Kavanagh | Indicated | 0.18 Mt | 0.12 g/t | 0.7 koz | 3.40 g/t | 0.02 Moz | 0.78% | 1.4 kt Cu | 30 Sept 2025 | 3Unverified | notes (4)Ref: 3
QA notes:
|
| North Kavanagh | Inferred | 0.20 Mt | 0.29 g/t | 1.9 koz | 2.80 g/t | 0.02 Moz | 0.74% | 1.5 kt Cu | 30 Sept 2025 | 3Unverified | notes (5)Ref: 3
QA notes:
|
| North Kavanagh | Total Resources | 0.38 Mt † | 0.21 g/t † | 0.00 Moz | — | — | 0.76% † | 0.00 Mt Cu | 30 Sept 2025 | 3Unverified | notes (4)Ref: 3
QA notes:
|
| Nugent | Measured | 0.55 Mt | 0.38 g/t | 0.01 Moz | 2.30 g/t | 0.04 Moz | 0.83% | 4.6 kt Cu | 30 Sept 2025 | 3Unverified | notes (4)Ref: 3
QA notes:
|
| Nugent | Indicated | 2.30 Mt | 0.37 g/t | 0.03 Moz | 2.00 g/t | 0.15 Moz | 0.75% | 0.02 Mt Cu | 30 Sept 2025 | 3Unverified | notes (5)Ref: 3
QA notes:
|
| Nugent | Inferred | 2.80 Mt | 0.26 g/t | 0.02 Moz | 1.90 g/t | 0.17 Moz | 0.78% | 0.02 Mt Cu | 30 Sept 2025 | 3Unverified | notes (4)Ref: 3
QA notes:
|
| Nugent | Total Resources | 5.70 Mt † | 0.32 g/t † | 1 koz | — | — | 0.77% † | 0.00 Mt Cu | 30 Sept 2025 | 3Unverified | notes (4)Ref: 3
QA notes:
|
| Valentines | Indicated | 0.20 Mt | 0.07 g/t | 0.5 koz | 1.30 g/t | 0.01 Moz | 0.65% | 1.3 kt Cu | 30 Sept 2025 | 3Unverified | notes (4)Ref: 3
QA notes:
|
| Valentines | Inferred | 0.34 Mt | 0.05 g/t | 0.5 koz | 1.20 g/t | 0.01 Moz | 0.55% | 1.9 kt Cu | 30 Sept 2025 | 3Unverified | notes (4)Ref: 3
QA notes:
|
| Valentines | Total Resources | 0.54 Mt † | 0.06 g/t † | 0.00 Moz | — | — | 0.59% † | 0.00 Mt Cu | 30 Sept 2025 | 3Unverified | notes (4)Ref: 3
QA notes:
|
| Area | Category | Tonnes (Mt) | Au | Ag | Cu | As at | Source | Provenance | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade (g/t Au) | Contained (Moz Au) | Grade (g/t Ag) | Contained (Moz Ag) | Grade (% Cu) | Contained (Mt Cu) | ||||||
| Total | Proved | 1.80 Mt | 0.16 g/t | 0.01 Moz | 2.60 g/t | 0.15 Moz | 0.92% | 0.02 Mt Cu | 01 July 2025 | 6Unverified | notes (5)Ref: 6
QA notes:
|
| Total | Probable | 2.20 Mt | 0.28 g/t | 0.02 Moz | 2.30 g/t | 0.16 Moz | 0.79% | 0.02 Mt Cu | 01 July 2025 | 6Unverified | |
| Total | Total Reserves | 4.00 Mt | 0.22 g/t | 0.03 Moz | 2.40 g/t | 0.31 Moz | 0.85% | 0.03 Mt Cu | 01 July 2025 | 6Unverified | notes (5) |
| Kavanagh | Proved | 1.50 Mt | 0.11 g/t | 0.01 Moz | 2.80 g/t | 0.14 Moz | 0.96% | 0.01 Mt Cu | 01 July 2025 | 6Unverified | notes (5) |
| Kavanagh | Probable | 0.90 Mt | 0.19 g/t | 0.01 Moz | 2.90 g/t | 0.08 Moz | 0.89% | 0.01 Mt Cu | 01 July 2025 | 6Unverified | notes (5)Source: |
| Kavanagh | Total Reserves | 2.30 Mt | 0.14 g/t | 0.01 Moz | 2.80 g/t | 0.21 Moz | 0.93% | 0.02 Mt Cu | 01 July 2025 | 6Unverified | notes (5) |
| Nugent | Proved | 0.36 Mt | 0.37 g/t | 4 koz | 1.90 g/t | 0.02 Moz | 0.73% | 3 kt Cu | 01 July 2025 | 6Unverified | notes (5) |
| Nugent | Probable | 1.30 Mt | 0.34 g/t | 0.01 Moz | 1.90 g/t | 0.08 Moz | 0.73% | 0.01 Mt Cu | 01 July 2025 | 6Unverified | notes (5) |
| Nugent | Total Reserves | 1.60 Mt | 0.35 g/t | 0.02 Moz | 1.90 g/t | 0.10 Moz | 0.73% | 0.01 Mt Cu | 01 July 2025 | 6Unverified | notes (5) |
Rows are hierarchical, not additive — do not sum a column across rows. Whole-project rows (Area “Total”) already contain the indented named-area rows beneath them, and an issuer's printed per-deposit total can itself contain other listed areas. All derived totals and rollups on this site already exclude the overlapping rows.
Dotted Total-row tonnes/grade are derived under the active Resources treatment: tonnes netted of (or grossed by) the reserve tonnage alongside contained, grade re-derived as netted contained ÷ netted tonnes — not the published figures.
† Total-row tonnes/grade as published (not net): the reserve statement prints no tonnage to net out, so only the contained figure honours the Resources treatment there.
notes (5)Ref: 6
QA notes:
|