These choices persist and are added to shared URLs.
Cue
Western Australia, Australia · ProducingManual entry
Current R&R by category
Whole-project rollup at the latest vintage per category: printed project-level rows are preferred, and mining areas are summed (tonnes-weighted grade) only where the issuer prints no project-level row. Per-area and per-source detail in the Current R&R table below.
Category
Tonnes (Mt)
Grade (g/t Au)
Contained (Moz Au)
As at
Measured
0.47 Mt
2.90 g/t
0.04 Moz
30 June 2026
Indicated
6.90 Mt
2.20 g/t
0.50 Moz
30 June 2026
Inferred
22.00 Mt
1.20 g/t
0.86 Moz
30 June 2026
Total Resources
21.67 Mt
1.28 g/t
0.89 Moz
30 June 2026
Proved
—
—
—
—
Probable
3.40 Mt
1.80 g/t
0.20 Moz
30 June 2026
Total Reserves
3.40 Mt
1.80 g/t
0.20 Moz
30 June 2026
Sub-category rows are as disclosed (no Reserves-treatment netting); the Total rows honour the Resources treatment and Inferred-policy toggles, so components may not sum to the Total.
Dotted tonnes/grade are derived under the active Resources treatment: tonnes are netted of (or grossed by) the reserve tonnage alongside contained, and grade is re-derived as netted contained ÷ netted tonnes — not the published figures.
Cut-off grade
—
Price assumption
A$3500.00/oz
JORC code year
2012
Peer benchmark — producing Au projects (282 with resources)Resource size P41Resource grade P51View on grade-tonnage chart →
Percentile of this project's current total Resource among covered peers (P100 = largest / highest grade). Basis and Inferred toggles apply.
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA WARN: tonnes/contained equal the SUM of 6 already-APPROVED row(s) of the same project/classification/category/commodity (Lena – Underground, Leviticus, Numbers, whole-project, White Heat OP, Break of Day – Open Pit) — a cross-document rollup whose component leaves were stored from another announcement (t58 CMM MGGP underground class). Approving it double-counts against the approved leaves; verify whether the print is a grouping line. QA INFO: recompute differs 2.39% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±9.00% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled.
QA approve (t119r): reconciled to the printed Table 13/14 figures; canonical project/deposit hierarchy applied
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA INFO: inclusive-of-reserves flag cleared on an inferred row — reserves derive from M&I only, so the flag is meaningless on inferred. QA WARN: area-NULL copy (22000000 t) matches the 'Open Pit Deposits' sibling (20000000 t) within print rounding — likely the SAME estimate from the summary and detail tables (t67 Bilboes class; rounding defeats exact dedup). Keep the key the book's series uses; reject the twin. QA INFO: recompute differs 2.44% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±7.01% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled.
QA correction (t119r): Table 13 prints Total Cue Inferred contained gold as 860 koz, not 870 koz
t119r
QA approve (t119r): reconciled to the printed Table 13/14 figures; canonical project/deposit hierarchy applied
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA WARN: area-NULL copy (30000000 t) matches the 'Open Pit Deposits' sibling (26000000 t) within print rounding — likely the SAME estimate from the summary and detail tables (t67 Bilboes class; rounding defeats exact dedup). Keep the key the book's series uses; reject the twin. QA INFO: recompute differs 3.34% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±12.90% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled.
QA approve (t119r): reconciled to the printed Table 13/14 figures; canonical project/deposit hierarchy applied
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA INFO: inclusive-of-reserves flag cleared on an inferred row — reserves derive from M&I only, so the flag is meaningless on inferred. QA INFO: recompute differs 1.62% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±5.97% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled.
QA approve (t119r): reconciled to the printed Table 13/14 figures; canonical project/deposit hierarchy applied
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA WARN: cross-category subtotal — this total_resource row on area 'A-Zone' equals the sum of the same area's inferred leaves — a per-deposit M&I/P&P-style total (t24 LUN/LUG NI 43-101 class). This can be an authoritative issuer-printed per-deposit total or an unhelpful intermediate subtotal. Verify the printed row: retain explicit deposit totals, but reject derived/unprinted or mid-tier rollups before approval. QA INFO: recompute differs 1.62% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±5.97% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled.
QA approve (t119r): reconciled to the printed Table 13/14 figures; canonical project/deposit hierarchy applied
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA WARN: figures within print rounding of a stored row of the same company/project/area/category under a DIFFERENT as-at date — likely a re-presentation (DFS / annual statement / global MRE restating an already-stored estimate, possibly at coarser rounding). Keep one operative copy; verify supersession before storing both. QA INFO: recompute differs 1.40% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±6.30% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled.
QA approve (t119r): reconciled to the printed Table 13/14 figures; canonical project/deposit hierarchy applied
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA INFO: inclusive-of-reserves flag cleared on an inferred row — reserves derive from M&I only, so the flag is meaningless on inferred. QA WARN: identical figures appear under ANOTHER area label of this project in the same document — likely one printed estimate stored twice (a summary/grouping line duplicating its leaf). Keep one copy; reject the relabelled twin. QA WARN: 2 rows share this exact identity in this document with CONFLICTING figures (sibling copies: t=11000000 g=0.8 conf=0.9). EITHER at most one matches the print (reject the fabricated copies), OR two DISTINCT printed lines collapsed onto one identity because an area label went missing (t63 White Rock: the deposit line and its group Total, both print-exact, on one empty-area key) — then restore the printed label of one copy (FIX mining_area) instead of rejecting — OR the copies come from differently YEAR-HEADED tables of a comparative filing (t67 NEM: every table prints at two year-ends and both copies are print-exact) — then FIX as_at_date to each copy's own table year instead of rejecting — OR both copies are print-exact and collided because a category/classification was mis-mapped (t71 EQX: per-classification Total rows all stored as total_resource) — then FIX category on the mis-mapped copy. QA WARN: figures within print rounding of a stored row of the same company/project/area/category under a DIFFERENT as-at date — likely a re-presentation (DFS / annual statement / global MRE restating an already-stored estimate, possibly at coarser rounding). Keep one operative copy; verify supersession before storing both. QA BLOCK: conflicting duplicate — this (project, mining area, commodity, classification, category, as-at date) appears 2 times in the document WITH DIFFERENT figures. At most one copy matches the print; verify each against the document and reject the rest (a copy whose figures appear nowhere in the text is fabricated). QA INFO: recompute differs 1.27% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±9.59% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled. QA INFO: identical figures to area(s) 'Waratah' — likely the same printed line under two labels (a summary and a detail table); keep one label and reject the other.
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA WARN: per-area total_resource row on area 'Amarillo' beside same-area category leaves — the per-deposit total shape needs source adjudication. Its tonnes do NOT reconcile with the stored leaves' sum, so a leaf may be corrupted or missing too (t57 LM8: the Upper indicated leaf carried the Total line's figures) — verify every row of this area against the print. QA WARN: figures within print rounding of a stored row of the same company/project/area/category under a DIFFERENT as-at date — likely a re-presentation (DFS / annual statement / global MRE restating an already-stored estimate, possibly at coarser rounding). Keep one operative copy; verify supersession before storing both. QA INFO: recompute differs 4.31% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±5.20% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled.
QA approve (t119r): reconciled to the printed Table 13/14 figures; canonical project/deposit hierarchy applied
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA INFO: recompute differs 6.24% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±7.52% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled.
QA approve (t119r): reconciled to the printed Table 13/14 figures; canonical project/deposit hierarchy applied
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA INFO: inclusive-of-reserves flag cleared on an inferred row — reserves derive from M&I only, so the flag is meaningless on inferred. QA WARN: identical figures appear under ANOTHER area label of this project in the same document — likely one printed estimate stored twice (a summary/grouping line duplicating its leaf). Keep one copy; reject the relabelled twin. QA WARN: 2 rows share this exact identity in this document with CONFLICTING figures (sibling copies: t=28000 g=0.9 conf=0.9). EITHER at most one matches the print (reject the fabricated copies), OR two DISTINCT printed lines collapsed onto one identity because an area label went missing (t63 White Rock: the deposit line and its group Total, both print-exact, on one empty-area key) — then restore the printed label of one copy (FIX mining_area) instead of rejecting — OR the copies come from differently YEAR-HEADED tables of a comparative filing (t67 NEM: every table prints at two year-ends and both copies are print-exact) — then FIX as_at_date to each copy's own table year instead of rejecting — OR both copies are print-exact and collided because a category/classification was mis-mapped (t71 EQX: per-classification Total rows all stored as total_resource) — then FIX category on the mis-mapped copy. QA BLOCK: conflicting duplicate — this (project, mining area, commodity, classification, category, as-at date) appears 2 times in the document WITH DIFFERENT figures. At most one copy matches the print; verify each against the document and reject the rest (a copy whose figures appear nowhere in the text is fabricated). QA INFO: recompute differs 3.11% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±7.96% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled. QA INFO: identical figures to area(s) 'Leviticus' — likely the same printed line under two labels (a summary and a detail table); keep one label and reject the other.
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA WARN: per-area total_resource row on area 'Big Sky' beside same-area category leaves — the per-deposit total shape needs source adjudication. Its tonnes do NOT reconcile with the stored leaves' sum, so a leaf may be corrupted or missing too (t57 LM8: the Upper indicated leaf carried the Total line's figures) — verify every row of this area against the print. QA WARN: tonnes AND contained equal the SUM of this company's APPROVED indicated+inferred rows under a DIFFERENT project (project 'Roe', area 'Kopai-Crescent') — likely a deposit re-filed as its own project totalling already-approved categories (deposit-as-project fragmentation). Keep one operative copy under the established filing. QA INFO: recompute differs 6.10% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±8.43% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled.
QA approve (t119r): reconciled to the printed Table 13/14 figures; canonical project/deposit hierarchy applied
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA WARN: identical tonnage to another row of THIS document labelled 'indicated' for the same project/area/commodity, while this row is labelled 'measured' — likely a category-column shift (Measured/Indicated/Inferred header misalignment at extraction), not a reclassification (which re-estimates the tonnage). Verify which classification the source prints; if this row's category is wrong the whole table is likely shifted. NOTE: a few issuers do print two categories with genuinely identical tonnage AND contained metal (t32 AAR Eagles Nest) — check the print before rejecting. QA INFO: recompute differs 1.32% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±5.71% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled.
QA approve (t119r): reconciled to the printed Table 13/14 figures; canonical project/deposit hierarchy applied
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA WARN: 3 rows share this exact identity in this document with CONFLICTING figures (sibling copies: t=35000 g=11.4 conf=0.85, t=340000 g=8.0 conf=0.75). EITHER at most one matches the print (reject the fabricated copies), OR two DISTINCT printed lines collapsed onto one identity because an area label went missing (t63 White Rock: the deposit line and its group Total, both print-exact, on one empty-area key) — then restore the printed label of one copy (FIX mining_area) instead of rejecting — OR the copies come from differently YEAR-HEADED tables of a comparative filing (t67 NEM: every table prints at two year-ends and both copies are print-exact) — then FIX as_at_date to each copy's own table year instead of rejecting — OR both copies are print-exact and collided because a category/classification was mis-mapped (t71 EQX: per-classification Total rows all stored as total_resource) — then FIX category on the mis-mapped copy. QA WARN: identical tonnage to another row of THIS document labelled 'inferred' for the same project/area/commodity, while this row is labelled 'indicated' — likely a category-column shift (Measured/Indicated/Inferred header misalignment at extraction), not a reclassification (which re-estimates the tonnage). Verify which classification the source prints; if this row's category is wrong the whole table is likely shifted. NOTE: a few issuers do print two categories with genuinely identical tonnage AND contained metal (t32 AAR Eagles Nest) — check the print before rejecting. QA BLOCK: conflicting duplicate — this (project, mining area, commodity, classification, category, as-at date) appears 3 times in the document WITH DIFFERENT figures. At most one copy matches the print; verify each against the document and reject the rest (a copy whose figures appear nowhere in the text is fabricated).
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA WARN: 2 rows share this exact identity in this document with CONFLICTING figures (sibling copies: t=420000 g=7.7 conf=0.75). EITHER at most one matches the print (reject the fabricated copies), OR two DISTINCT printed lines collapsed onto one identity because an area label went missing (t63 White Rock: the deposit line and its group Total, both print-exact, on one empty-area key) — then restore the printed label of one copy (FIX mining_area) instead of rejecting — OR the copies come from differently YEAR-HEADED tables of a comparative filing (t67 NEM: every table prints at two year-ends and both copies are print-exact) — then FIX as_at_date to each copy's own table year instead of rejecting — OR both copies are print-exact and collided because a category/classification was mis-mapped (t71 EQX: per-classification Total rows all stored as total_resource) — then FIX category on the mis-mapped copy. QA WARN: cross-category subtotal — this total_resource row on area 'Break of Day' equals the sum of the same area's measured+indicated leaves — a per-deposit M&I/P&P-style total (t24 LUN/LUG NI 43-101 class). This can be an authoritative issuer-printed per-deposit total or an unhelpful intermediate subtotal. Verify the printed row: retain explicit deposit totals, but reject derived/unprinted or mid-tier rollups before approval. QA BLOCK: conflicting duplicate — this (project, mining area, commodity, classification, category, as-at date) appears 2 times in the document WITH DIFFERENT figures. At most one copy matches the print; verify each against the document and reject the rest (a copy whose figures appear nowhere in the text is fabricated).
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA WARN: identical figures appear under ANOTHER area label of this project in the same document — likely one printed estimate stored twice (a summary/grouping line duplicating its leaf). Keep one copy; reject the relabelled twin. QA INFO: identical figures to area(s) 'Break of Day' — likely the same printed line under two labels (a summary and a detail table); keep one label and reject the other.
QA approve (t119r): reconciled to the printed Table 13/14 figures; canonical project/deposit hierarchy applied
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA INFO: inclusive-of-reserves flag cleared on an inferred row — reserves derive from M&I only, so the flag is meaningless on inferred. QA WARN: identical figures appear under ANOTHER area label of this project in the same document — likely one printed estimate stored twice (a summary/grouping line duplicating its leaf). Keep one copy; reject the relabelled twin. QA INFO: recompute differs 2.50% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±3.96% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled. QA INFO: identical figures to area(s) 'Break of Day' — likely the same printed line under two labels (a summary and a detail table); keep one label and reject the other.
QA approve (t119r): reconciled to the printed Table 13/14 figures; canonical project/deposit hierarchy applied
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA WARN: identical figures appear under ANOTHER area label of this project in the same document — likely one printed estimate stored twice (a summary/grouping line duplicating its leaf). Keep one copy; reject the relabelled twin. QA WARN: cross-category subtotal — this total_resource row on area 'Break of Day UG' equals the sum of the same area's indicated+inferred leaves — a per-deposit M&I/P&P-style total (t24 LUN/LUG NI 43-101 class). This can be an authoritative issuer-printed per-deposit total or an unhelpful intermediate subtotal. Verify the printed row: retain explicit deposit totals, but reject derived/unprinted or mid-tier rollups before approval. QA INFO: recompute differs 5.48% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±6.39% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled. QA INFO: identical figures to area(s) 'Break of Day' — likely the same printed line under two labels (a summary and a detail table); keep one label and reject the other.
QA approve (t119r): reconciled to the printed Table 13/14 figures; canonical project/deposit hierarchy applied
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA INFO: recompute differs 5.48% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±9.84% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled.
QA approve (t119r): reconciled to the printed Table 13/14 figures; canonical project/deposit hierarchy applied
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA WARN: 2 rows share this exact identity in this document with CONFLICTING figures (sibling copies: t=1000000 g=2.4 conf=0.75). EITHER at most one matches the print (reject the fabricated copies), OR two DISTINCT printed lines collapsed onto one identity because an area label went missing (t63 White Rock: the deposit line and its group Total, both print-exact, on one empty-area key) — then restore the printed label of one copy (FIX mining_area) instead of rejecting — OR the copies come from differently YEAR-HEADED tables of a comparative filing (t67 NEM: every table prints at two year-ends and both copies are print-exact) — then FIX as_at_date to each copy's own table year instead of rejecting — OR both copies are print-exact and collided because a category/classification was mis-mapped (t71 EQX: per-classification Total rows all stored as total_resource) — then FIX category on the mis-mapped copy. QA BLOCK: conflicting duplicate — this (project, mining area, commodity, classification, category, as-at date) appears 2 times in the document WITH DIFFERENT figures. At most one copy matches the print; verify each against the document and reject the rest (a copy whose figures appear nowhere in the text is fabricated). QA INFO: recompute differs 4.01% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±8.48% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled.
QA approve (t119r): reconciled to the printed Table 13/14 figures; canonical project/deposit hierarchy applied
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA INFO: inclusive-of-reserves flag cleared on an inferred row — reserves derive from M&I only, so the flag is meaningless on inferred. QA WARN: identical figures appear under ANOTHER area label of this project in the same document — likely one printed estimate stored twice (a summary/grouping line duplicating its leaf). Keep one copy; reject the relabelled twin. QA WARN: 3 rows share this exact identity in this document with CONFLICTING figures (sibling copies: t=14000 g=3.1 conf=0.9, t=1900000 g=2.4 conf=0.75). EITHER at most one matches the print (reject the fabricated copies), OR two DISTINCT printed lines collapsed onto one identity because an area label went missing (t63 White Rock: the deposit line and its group Total, both print-exact, on one empty-area key) — then restore the printed label of one copy (FIX mining_area) instead of rejecting — OR the copies come from differently YEAR-HEADED tables of a comparative filing (t67 NEM: every table prints at two year-ends and both copies are print-exact) — then FIX as_at_date to each copy's own table year instead of rejecting — OR both copies are print-exact and collided because a category/classification was mis-mapped (t71 EQX: per-classification Total rows all stored as total_resource) — then FIX category on the mis-mapped copy. QA BLOCK: conflicting duplicate — this (project, mining area, commodity, classification, category, as-at date) appears 3 times in the document WITH DIFFERENT figures. At most one copy matches the print; verify each against the document and reject the rest (a copy whose figures appear nowhere in the text is fabricated). QA INFO: recompute differs 1.59% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±6.44% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled. QA INFO: identical figures to area(s) 'White Heat' — likely the same printed line under two labels (a summary and a detail table); keep one label and reject the other.
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA WARN: 2 rows share this exact identity in this document with CONFLICTING figures (sibling copies: t=3000000 g=2.4 conf=0.75). EITHER at most one matches the print (reject the fabricated copies), OR two DISTINCT printed lines collapsed onto one identity because an area label went missing (t63 White Rock: the deposit line and its group Total, both print-exact, on one empty-area key) — then restore the printed label of one copy (FIX mining_area) instead of rejecting — OR the copies come from differently YEAR-HEADED tables of a comparative filing (t67 NEM: every table prints at two year-ends and both copies are print-exact) — then FIX as_at_date to each copy's own table year instead of rejecting — OR both copies are print-exact and collided because a category/classification was mis-mapped (t71 EQX: per-classification Total rows all stored as total_resource) — then FIX category on the mis-mapped copy. QA WARN: per-area total_resource row on area 'Lena' beside same-area category leaves — the per-deposit total shape needs source adjudication. Its tonnes do NOT reconcile with the stored leaves' sum, so a leaf may be corrupted or missing too (t57 LM8: the Upper indicated leaf carried the Total line's figures) — verify every row of this area against the print. QA BLOCK: conflicting duplicate — this (project, mining area, commodity, classification, category, as-at date) appears 2 times in the document WITH DIFFERENT figures. At most one copy matches the print; verify each against the document and reject the rest (a copy whose figures appear nowhere in the text is fabricated). QA INFO: recompute differs 3.08% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±7.61% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled.
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA WARN: identical figures appear under ANOTHER area label of this project in the same document — likely one printed estimate stored twice (a summary/grouping line duplicating its leaf). Keep one copy; reject the relabelled twin. QA INFO: recompute differs 5.90% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±8.69% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled. QA INFO: identical figures to area(s) 'Lena' — likely the same printed line under two labels (a summary and a detail table); keep one label and reject the other.
QA approve (t119r): reconciled to the printed Table 13/14 figures; canonical project/deposit hierarchy applied
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA INFO: inclusive-of-reserves flag cleared on an inferred row — reserves derive from M&I only, so the flag is meaningless on inferred. QA WARN: identical figures appear under ANOTHER area label of this project in the same document — likely one printed estimate stored twice (a summary/grouping line duplicating its leaf). Keep one copy; reject the relabelled twin. QA WARN: mining_area 'Lena UG' equals the sum of sibling areas (arithmetic subtotal), not a leaf area — approving it alongside the leaf areas double-counts. Reject it (or reject the leaves) before approval. QA INFO: recompute differs 2.26% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±8.05% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled. QA INFO: identical figures to area(s) 'Lena' — likely the same printed line under two labels (a summary and a detail table); keep one label and reject the other.
QA approve (t119r): reconciled to the printed Table 13/14 figures; canonical project/deposit hierarchy applied
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA WARN: identical figures appear under ANOTHER area label of this project in the same document — likely one printed estimate stored twice (a summary/grouping line duplicating its leaf). Keep one copy; reject the relabelled twin. QA WARN: per-area total_resource row on area 'Lena UG' beside same-area category leaves — the per-deposit total shape needs source adjudication. Its tonnes do NOT reconcile with the stored leaves' sum, so a leaf may be corrupted or missing too (t57 LM8: the Upper indicated leaf carried the Total line's figures) — verify every row of this area against the print. QA INFO: identical figures to area(s) 'Lena' — likely the same printed line under two labels (a summary and a detail table); keep one label and reject the other.
QA approve (t119r): reconciled to the printed Table 13/14 figures; canonical project/deposit hierarchy applied
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA INFO: recompute differs 3.55% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±13.41% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled.
QA approve (t119r): reconciled to the printed Table 13/14 figures; canonical project/deposit hierarchy applied
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA INFO: inclusive-of-reserves flag cleared on an inferred row — reserves derive from M&I only, so the flag is meaningless on inferred. QA WARN: identical figures appear under ANOTHER area label of this project in the same document — likely one printed estimate stored twice (a summary/grouping line duplicating its leaf). Keep one copy; reject the relabelled twin. QA WARN: 2 rows share this exact identity in this document with CONFLICTING figures (sibling copies: t=2200000 g=1.0 conf=0.9). EITHER at most one matches the print (reject the fabricated copies), OR two DISTINCT printed lines collapsed onto one identity because an area label went missing (t63 White Rock: the deposit line and its group Total, both print-exact, on one empty-area key) — then restore the printed label of one copy (FIX mining_area) instead of rejecting — OR the copies come from differently YEAR-HEADED tables of a comparative filing (t67 NEM: every table prints at two year-ends and both copies are print-exact) — then FIX as_at_date to each copy's own table year instead of rejecting — OR both copies are print-exact and collided because a category/classification was mis-mapped (t71 EQX: per-classification Total rows all stored as total_resource) — then FIX category on the mis-mapped copy. QA BLOCK: conflicting duplicate — this (project, mining area, commodity, classification, category, as-at date) appears 2 times in the document WITH DIFFERENT figures. At most one copy matches the print; verify each against the document and reject the rest (a copy whose figures appear nowhere in the text is fabricated). QA INFO: identical figures to area(s) 'Lena' — likely the same printed line under two labels (a summary and a detail table); keep one label and reject the other.
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA WARN: per-area total_resource row on area 'Leviticus' beside same-area category leaves — the per-deposit total shape needs source adjudication. Its tonnes do NOT reconcile with the stored leaves' sum, so a leaf may be corrupted or missing too (t57 LM8: the Upper indicated leaf carried the Total line's figures) — verify every row of this area against the print. QA INFO: recompute differs 3.56% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±4.18% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled.
QA approve (t119r): reconciled to the printed Table 13/14 figures; canonical project/deposit hierarchy applied
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA WARN: figures within print rounding of a stored row of the same company/project/area/category under a DIFFERENT as-at date — likely a re-presentation (DFS / annual statement / global MRE restating an already-stored estimate, possibly at coarser rounding). Keep one operative copy; verify supersession before storing both. QA INFO: recompute differs 2.71% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±7.20% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled.
QA approve (t119r): reconciled to the printed Table 13/14 figures; canonical project/deposit hierarchy applied
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA INFO: inclusive-of-reserves flag cleared on an inferred row — reserves derive from M&I only, so the flag is meaningless on inferred. QA WARN: identical figures appear under ANOTHER area label of this project in the same document — likely one printed estimate stored twice (a summary/grouping line duplicating its leaf). Keep one copy; reject the relabelled twin. QA WARN: 2 rows share this exact identity in this document with CONFLICTING figures (sibling copies: t=49000 g=1.0 conf=0.9). EITHER at most one matches the print (reject the fabricated copies), OR two DISTINCT printed lines collapsed onto one identity because an area label went missing (t63 White Rock: the deposit line and its group Total, both print-exact, on one empty-area key) — then restore the printed label of one copy (FIX mining_area) instead of rejecting — OR the copies come from differently YEAR-HEADED tables of a comparative filing (t67 NEM: every table prints at two year-ends and both copies are print-exact) — then FIX as_at_date to each copy's own table year instead of rejecting — OR both copies are print-exact and collided because a category/classification was mis-mapped (t71 EQX: per-classification Total rows all stored as total_resource) — then FIX category on the mis-mapped copy. QA BLOCK: conflicting duplicate — this (project, mining area, commodity, classification, category, as-at date) appears 2 times in the document WITH DIFFERENT figures. At most one copy matches the print; verify each against the document and reject the rest (a copy whose figures appear nowhere in the text is fabricated). QA INFO: recompute differs 1.27% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±13.34% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled. QA INFO: identical figures to area(s) 'Big Sky' — likely the same printed line under two labels (a summary and a detail table); keep one label and reject the other.
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA WARN: per-area total_resource row on area 'Numbers' beside same-area category leaves — the per-deposit total shape needs source adjudication. Its tonnes do NOT reconcile with the stored leaves' sum, so a leaf may be corrupted or missing too (t57 LM8: the Upper indicated leaf carried the Total line's figures) — verify every row of this area against the print. QA WARN: figures within print rounding of a stored row of the same company/project/area/category under a DIFFERENT as-at date — likely a re-presentation (DFS / annual statement / global MRE restating an already-stored estimate, possibly at coarser rounding). Keep one operative copy; verify supersession before storing both. QA INFO: recompute differs 2.32% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±7.16% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled.
QA approve (t119r): reconciled to the printed Table 13/14 figures; canonical project/deposit hierarchy applied
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA WARN: identical figures appear under ANOTHER area label of this project in the same document — likely one printed estimate stored twice (a summary/grouping line duplicating its leaf). Keep one copy; reject the relabelled twin. QA WARN: figures within print rounding of a stored row of the same company/project/area/category under a DIFFERENT as-at date — likely a re-presentation (DFS / annual statement / global MRE restating an already-stored estimate, possibly at coarser rounding). Keep one operative copy; verify supersession before storing both. QA INFO: recompute differs 1.05% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±13.05% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled. QA INFO: identical figures to area(s) 'Numbers' — likely the same printed line under two labels (a summary and a detail table); keep one label and reject the other.
QA approve (t119r): reconciled to the printed Table 13/14 figures; canonical project/deposit hierarchy applied
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA WARN: figures within print rounding of a stored row of the same company/project/area/category under a DIFFERENT as-at date — likely a re-presentation (DFS / annual statement / global MRE restating an already-stored estimate, possibly at coarser rounding). Keep one operative copy; verify supersession before storing both. QA INFO: recompute differs 2.40% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±4.80% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled.
QA approve (t119r): reconciled to the printed Table 13/14 figures; canonical project/deposit hierarchy applied
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA INFO: inclusive-of-reserves flag cleared on an inferred row — reserves derive from M&I only, so the flag is meaningless on inferred. QA WARN: identical figures appear under ANOTHER area label of this project in the same document — likely one printed estimate stored twice (a summary/grouping line duplicating its leaf). Keep one copy; reject the relabelled twin. QA WARN: 2 rows share this exact identity in this document with CONFLICTING figures (sibling copies: t=270000 g=1.4 conf=0.9). EITHER at most one matches the print (reject the fabricated copies), OR two DISTINCT printed lines collapsed onto one identity because an area label went missing (t63 White Rock: the deposit line and its group Total, both print-exact, on one empty-area key) — then restore the printed label of one copy (FIX mining_area) instead of rejecting — OR the copies come from differently YEAR-HEADED tables of a comparative filing (t67 NEM: every table prints at two year-ends and both copies are print-exact) — then FIX as_at_date to each copy's own table year instead of rejecting — OR both copies are print-exact and collided because a category/classification was mis-mapped (t71 EQX: per-classification Total rows all stored as total_resource) — then FIX category on the mis-mapped copy. QA WARN: figures within print rounding of a stored row of the same company/project/area/category under a DIFFERENT as-at date — likely a re-presentation (DFS / annual statement / global MRE restating an already-stored estimate, possibly at coarser rounding). Keep one operative copy; verify supersession before storing both. QA BLOCK: conflicting duplicate — this (project, mining area, commodity, classification, category, as-at date) appears 2 times in the document WITH DIFFERENT figures. At most one copy matches the print; verify each against the document and reject the rest (a copy whose figures appear nowhere in the text is fabricated). QA INFO: recompute differs 1.54% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±9.15% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled. QA INFO: identical figures to area(s) 'Numbers' — likely the same printed line under two labels (a summary and a detail table); keep one label and reject the other.
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA WARN: per-area total_resource row on area 'Waratah' beside same-area category leaves — the per-deposit total shape needs source adjudication. Its tonnes do NOT reconcile with the stored leaves' sum, so a leaf may be corrupted or missing too (t57 LM8: the Upper indicated leaf carried the Total line's figures) — verify every row of this area against the print. QA WARN: figures within print rounding of a stored row of the same company/project/area/category under a DIFFERENT as-at date — likely a re-presentation (DFS / annual statement / global MRE restating an already-stored estimate, possibly at coarser rounding). Keep one operative copy; verify supersession before storing both. QA INFO: recompute differs 3.30% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±8.96% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled.
QA approve (t119r): reconciled to the printed Table 13/14 figures; canonical project/deposit hierarchy applied
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA INFO: inclusive-of-reserves flag cleared on an inferred row — reserves derive from M&I only, so the flag is meaningless on inferred. QA WARN: identical figures appear under ANOTHER area label of this project in the same document — likely one printed estimate stored twice (a summary/grouping line duplicating its leaf). Keep one copy; reject the relabelled twin. QA INFO: recompute differs 5.69% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±15.00% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled. QA INFO: identical figures to area(s) 'Amarillo' — likely the same printed line under two labels (a summary and a detail table); keep one label and reject the other.
QA approve (t119r): reconciled to the printed Table 13/14 figures; canonical project/deposit hierarchy applied
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA WARN: cross-category subtotal — this total_resource row on area 'West Island' equals the sum of the same area's inferred leaves — a per-deposit M&I/P&P-style total (t24 LUN/LUG NI 43-101 class). This can be an authoritative issuer-printed per-deposit total or an unhelpful intermediate subtotal. Verify the printed row: retain explicit deposit totals, but reject derived/unprinted or mid-tier rollups before approval. QA INFO: recompute differs 5.69% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±15.00% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled.
QA approve (t119r): reconciled to the printed Table 13/14 figures; canonical project/deposit hierarchy applied
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA WARN: 2 rows share this exact identity in this document with CONFLICTING figures (sibling copies: t=8300.0 g=5.6 conf=0.75). EITHER at most one matches the print (reject the fabricated copies), OR two DISTINCT printed lines collapsed onto one identity because an area label went missing (t63 White Rock: the deposit line and its group Total, both print-exact, on one empty-area key) — then restore the printed label of one copy (FIX mining_area) instead of rejecting — OR the copies come from differently YEAR-HEADED tables of a comparative filing (t67 NEM: every table prints at two year-ends and both copies are print-exact) — then FIX as_at_date to each copy's own table year instead of rejecting — OR both copies are print-exact and collided because a category/classification was mis-mapped (t71 EQX: per-classification Total rows all stored as total_resource) — then FIX category on the mis-mapped copy. QA BLOCK: conflicting duplicate — this (project, mining area, commodity, classification, category, as-at date) appears 2 times in the document WITH DIFFERENT figures. At most one copy matches the print; verify each against the document and reject the rest (a copy whose figures appear nowhere in the text is fabricated). QA INFO: recompute differs 5.03% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±9.01% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled.
QA approve (t119r): reconciled to the printed Table 13/14 figures; canonical project/deposit hierarchy applied
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA INFO: recompute differs 1.05% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±3.36% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled.
QA approve (t119r): reconciled to the printed Table 13/14 figures; canonical project/deposit hierarchy applied
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA INFO: inclusive-of-reserves flag cleared on an inferred row — reserves derive from M&I only, so the flag is meaningless on inferred. QA WARN: identical figures appear under ANOTHER area label of this project in the same document — likely one printed estimate stored twice (a summary/grouping line duplicating its leaf). Keep one copy; reject the relabelled twin. QA WARN: 2 rows share this exact identity in this document with CONFLICTING figures (sibling copies: t=440000 g=1.6 conf=0.9). EITHER at most one matches the print (reject the fabricated copies), OR two DISTINCT printed lines collapsed onto one identity because an area label went missing (t63 White Rock: the deposit line and its group Total, both print-exact, on one empty-area key) — then restore the printed label of one copy (FIX mining_area) instead of rejecting — OR the copies come from differently YEAR-HEADED tables of a comparative filing (t67 NEM: every table prints at two year-ends and both copies are print-exact) — then FIX as_at_date to each copy's own table year instead of rejecting — OR both copies are print-exact and collided because a category/classification was mis-mapped (t71 EQX: per-classification Total rows all stored as total_resource) — then FIX category on the mis-mapped copy. QA WARN: tonnes AND contained match an approved estimate of this company filed under a DIFFERENT identity (project 'Cue', area 'White Heat OP') — likely a cross-project re-presentation / umbrella-alias copy of that estimate; keep one operative copy under the established filing. QA BLOCK: conflicting duplicate — this (project, mining area, commodity, classification, category, as-at date) appears 2 times in the document WITH DIFFERENT figures. At most one copy matches the print; verify each against the document and reject the rest (a copy whose figures appear nowhere in the text is fabricated). QA INFO: recompute differs 2.28% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±4.60% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled. QA INFO: identical figures to area(s) 'Break of Day' — likely the same printed line under two labels (a summary and a detail table); keep one label and reject the other.
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA WARN: per-area total_resource row on area 'White Heat' beside same-area category leaves — the per-deposit total shape needs source adjudication. Its tonnes do NOT reconcile with the stored leaves' sum, so a leaf may be corrupted or missing too (t57 LM8: the Upper indicated leaf carried the Total line's figures) — verify every row of this area against the print. QA INFO: recompute differs 3.55% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±11.45% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled.
QA approve (t119r): reconciled to the printed Table 13/14 figures; canonical project/deposit hierarchy applied
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA WARN: cross-category subtotal — this total_resource row on area 'White Heat UG' equals the sum of the same area's inferred leaves — a per-deposit M&I/P&P-style total (t24 LUN/LUG NI 43-101 class). This can be an authoritative issuer-printed per-deposit total or an unhelpful intermediate subtotal. Verify the printed row: retain explicit deposit totals, but reject derived/unprinted or mid-tier rollups before approval.
QA approve (t119r): reconciled to the printed Table 13/14 figures; canonical project/deposit hierarchy applied
@ A$ 3,500/oz — Metal price assumption used to derive this estimate.
QA notes:
QA WARN: tonnes/contained equal the SUM of 6 sibling row(s) of the same classification/category/commodity (Total Underground, Break of Day, Lena, Big Sky, Numbers, Amarillo) — likely a printed multi-deposit rollup/subtotal. Policy keeps leaf rows and printed whole-project Totals only; reject mid-level rollups (double-count). QA INFO: recompute differs 1.62% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±10.25% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled.
QA approve (t119r): reconciled to the printed Table 13/14 figures; canonical project/deposit hierarchy applied
Rows are hierarchical, not additive — do not sum a column across rows. Whole-project rows (Area “Total”) already contain the indented named-area rows beneath them, and an issuer's printed per-deposit total can itself contain other listed areas. All derived totals and rollups on this site already exclude the overlapping rows.
Dotted Total-row tonnes/grade are derived under the active Resources treatment: tonnes netted of (or grossed by) the reserve tonnage alongside contained, grade re-derived as netted contained ÷ netted tonnes — not the published figures.
† Total-row tonnes/grade as published (not net): the reserve statement prints no tonnage to net out, so only the contained figure honours the Resources treatment there.
QA approve (t119r): reconciled to the printed Table 13/14 figures; canonical project/deposit hierarchy applied
t119r
QA approve (t119r): reconciled to the printed Table 13/14 figures; canonical project/deposit hierarchy applied
t119r
QA approve (t119r): reconciled to the printed Table 13/14 figures; canonical project/deposit hierarchy applied
t119r
QA approve (t119r): reconciled to the printed Table 13/14 figures; canonical project/deposit hierarchy applied
t119r
t119r
QA approve (t119r): reconciled to the printed Table 13/14 figures; canonical project/deposit hierarchy applied
t119r
QA approve (t119r): reconciled to the printed Table 13/14 figures; canonical project/deposit hierarchy applied
t119r
QA approve (t119r): reconciled to the printed Table 13/14 figures; canonical project/deposit hierarchy applied
t119r
QA approve (t119r): reconciled to the printed Table 13/14 figures; canonical project/deposit hierarchy applied
t119r
QA approve (t119r): reconciled to the printed Table 13/14 figures; canonical project/deposit hierarchy applied
t119r
t119r
QA approve (t119r): reconciled to the printed Table 13/14 figures; canonical project/deposit hierarchy applied
QA INFO: inclusive-of-reserves flag cleared — the flag describes resource statements; reserve rows carry none. QA INFO: recompute differs 1.62% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±10.25% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled.
QA approve (t119r): reconciled to the printed Table 13/14 figures; canonical project/deposit hierarchy applied
t119r
JORC 2012 — Reporting code of record: JORC 2012
QA notes:
QA INFO: inclusive-of-reserves flag cleared — the flag describes resource statements; reserve rows carry none.
QA approve (t119r): reconciled to the printed Table 13/14 figures; canonical project/deposit hierarchy applied
t119r
Unknown code — Reporting code not yet captured for this row.
t85rb hub re-file: Break of Day is a deposit of the Cue project per Ramelius' own 2025 Resources & Reserves Statement (doc 6f20fc33, published 2025-10-01), Table 1 'Mineral Resources as at 30 June 2025' — printed under Cue in both the Open Pit Deposits and UG Deposits sub-blocks; the p.3 commentary names the same eight deposits. Row moved from the standalone 'Break of Day' project key to 'Cue' with mining_area='Break of Day'; figures, vintage and qa_status unchanged. The standalone key was deleted (it held no other rows).
t88 swarm r2 (a1): reserve/probable Au area='Break of Day' 600,000 t @ 3.6 g/t = 69,000 oz (doc 8a915502): the bare label sits alongside 'Break of Day – Underground' 480,000 t @ 3.6 g/t = 57,000 oz. Treated as SIBLINGS (open pit + underground), which is what reconciles: all 8 deposit reserves then sum 3,700,000 t / 229,900 oz vs the printed project 3,800,000 t / 250,000 oz (-2.63% / -8.04%); reading it as a parent would leave a 15% hole. Capture-spec candidate: normalise the area to 'Break of Day – Open Pit'. No status change.
t85rb hub re-file: Break of Day is a deposit of the Cue project per Ramelius' own 2025 Resources & Reserves Statement (doc 6f20fc33, published 2025-10-01), Table 1 'Mineral Resources as at 30 June 2025' — printed under Cue in both the Open Pit Deposits and UG Deposits sub-blocks; the p.3 commentary names the same eight deposits. Row moved from the standalone 'Break of Day' project key to 'Cue' with mining_area='Break of Day'; figures, vintage and qa_status unchanged. The standalone key was deleted (it held no other rows).
t88 swarm r2 (a1): reserve/total_reserve Au area='Break of Day' 600,000 t @ 3.6 g/t = 69,000 oz (doc 8a915502): the bare label sits alongside 'Break of Day – Underground' 480,000 t @ 3.6 g/t = 57,000 oz. Treated as SIBLINGS (open pit + underground), which is what reconciles: all 8 deposit reserves then sum 3,700,000 t / 229,900 oz vs the printed project 3,800,000 t / 250,000 oz (-2.63% / -8.04%); reading it as a parent would leave a 15% hole. Capture-spec candidate: normalise the area to 'Break of Day – Open Pit'. No status change.
· published 25 Aug 2026
Ref: 34
JORC 2012 — Reporting code of record: JORC 2012
QA notes:
QA INFO: inclusive-of-reserves flag cleared — the flag describes resource statements; reserve rows carry none. QA INFO: recompute differs 2.02% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±4.00% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled.
QA approve (t119r): reconciled to the printed Table 13/14 figures; canonical project/deposit hierarchy applied
t119r
Unknown code — Reporting code not yet captured for this row.
QA notes:
QA capture (t119r): printed row omitted by extraction; Table 14 page 34: Cue / Break of Day – Open Pit / total_reserve
QA INFO: inclusive-of-reserves flag cleared — the flag describes resource statements; reserve rows carry none. QA WARN: identical figures appear under ANOTHER area label of this project in the same document — likely one printed estimate stored twice (a summary/grouping line duplicating its leaf). Keep one copy; reject the relabelled twin. QA INFO: identical figures to area(s) 'Total Underground' — likely the same printed line under two labels (a summary and a detail table); keep one label and reject the other.
QA approve (t119r): reconciled to the printed Table 13/14 figures; canonical project/deposit hierarchy applied
t119r
Unknown code — Reporting code not yet captured for this row.
QA notes:
QA capture (t119r): printed row omitted by extraction; Table 14 page 34: Cue / Break of Day – Underground / total_reserve
QA INFO: recompute differs 2.05% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained are only good to ±6.39% (rounding granularity) — treated as reconciled.
t85rb hub re-file: Lena is a deposit of the Cue project per Ramelius' own 2025 Resources & Reserves Statement (doc 6f20fc33, published 2025-10-01), Table 1 'Mineral Resources as at 30 June 2025' — printed under Cue in both the Open Pit Deposits and UG Deposits sub-blocks; the p.3 commentary names the same eight deposits. Row moved from the standalone 'Lena' project key to 'Cue' with mining_area='Lena'; figures, vintage and qa_status unchanged. The standalone key was deleted (it held no other rows).
QA INFO: recompute differs 2.05% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained are only good to ±6.39% (rounding granularity) — treated as reconciled.
t85rb hub re-file: Lena is a deposit of the Cue project per Ramelius' own 2025 Resources & Reserves Statement (doc 6f20fc33, published 2025-10-01), Table 1 'Mineral Resources as at 30 June 2025' — printed under Cue in both the Open Pit Deposits and UG Deposits sub-blocks; the p.3 commentary names the same eight deposits. Row moved from the standalone 'Lena' project key to 'Cue' with mining_area='Lena'; figures, vintage and qa_status unchanged. The standalone key was deleted (it held no other rows).
JORC 2012 — Reporting code of record: JORC 2012
QA notes:
QA INFO: inclusive-of-reserves flag cleared — the flag describes resource statements; reserve rows carry none.
QA approve (t119r): reconciled to the printed Table 13/14 figures; canonical project/deposit hierarchy applied
t119r
Unknown code — Reporting code not yet captured for this row.
QA notes:
QA capture (t119r): printed row omitted by extraction; Table 14 page 34: Cue / Lena – Open Pit / total_reserve
340 kt
1.1 g/t Au
12 koz Au
t119r
· published 28 Oct 2025
Ref: 34
JORC 2012 — Reporting code of record: JORC 2012
QA notes:
t85rb hub re-file: Leviticus is a deposit of the Cue project per Ramelius' own 2025 Resources & Reserves Statement (doc 6f20fc33, published 2025-10-01), Table 1 'Mineral Resources as at 30 June 2025' — printed under Cue in both the Open Pit Deposits and UG Deposits sub-blocks; the p.3 commentary names the same eight deposits. Row moved from the standalone 'Leviticus' project key to 'Cue' with mining_area='Leviticus'; figures, vintage and qa_status unchanged. The standalone key was deleted (it held no other rows).
· published 28 Oct 2025
Ref: 34
JORC 2012 — Reporting code of record: JORC 2012
QA notes:
t85rb hub re-file: Leviticus is a deposit of the Cue project per Ramelius' own 2025 Resources & Reserves Statement (doc 6f20fc33, published 2025-10-01), Table 1 'Mineral Resources as at 30 June 2025' — printed under Cue in both the Open Pit Deposits and UG Deposits sub-blocks; the p.3 commentary names the same eight deposits. Row moved from the standalone 'Leviticus' project key to 'Cue' with mining_area='Leviticus'; figures, vintage and qa_status unchanged. The standalone key was deleted (it held no other rows).
JORC 2012 — Reporting code of record: JORC 2012
QA notes:
QA INFO: inclusive-of-reserves flag cleared — the flag describes resource statements; reserve rows carry none.
QA approve (t119r): reconciled to the printed Table 13/14 figures; canonical project/deposit hierarchy applied
t119r
Unknown code — Reporting code not yet captured for this row.
QA INFO: recompute differs 2.26% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained are only good to ±10.44% (rounding granularity) — treated as reconciled.
t85rb hub re-file: Waratah is a deposit of the Cue project per Ramelius' own 2025 Resources & Reserves Statement (doc 6f20fc33, published 2025-10-01), Table 1 'Mineral Resources as at 30 June 2025' — printed under Cue in both the Open Pit Deposits and UG Deposits sub-blocks; the p.3 commentary names the same eight deposits. Row moved from the standalone 'Waratah' project key to 'Cue' with mining_area='Waratah'; figures, vintage and qa_status unchanged. The standalone key was deleted (it held no other rows).
QA INFO: recompute differs 2.26% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained are only good to ±10.44% (rounding granularity) — treated as reconciled.
t85rb hub re-file: Waratah is a deposit of the Cue project per Ramelius' own 2025 Resources & Reserves Statement (doc 6f20fc33, published 2025-10-01), Table 1 'Mineral Resources as at 30 June 2025' — printed under Cue in both the Open Pit Deposits and UG Deposits sub-blocks; the p.3 commentary names the same eight deposits. Row moved from the standalone 'Waratah' project key to 'Cue' with mining_area='Waratah'; figures, vintage and qa_status unchanged. The standalone key was deleted (it held no other rows).