View settings100% · M+I+I · Resources excl. reserves · Native commodities

Reporting assumptions

These choices persist and are added to shared URLs.

Ownership basis

Show the full project inventory before ownership adjustment.

Display scale

Display contained quantities in millions of ounces or tonnes.

Resource treatment

Normalise Resources to exclude Reserves: where a project is flagged inclusive, net Reserves out of Resources so the figure is additional Resources beyond Reserves. Unknown-convention rows are shown as stated.

Resource total

Total Resource includes Inferred (JORC convention). Totals are re-derived from category rows wherever the document discloses them.

Recovery basis

Show the issuer's headline recoverable figure as reported. Lithium-brine reserves already have the brine-processing recovery factor applied; everything else is shown as stated.

Commodity view

Primary view: each commodity in its own contained unit (oz / t).

Rebecca

Western Australia, Australia · Developing · 100.0% ownedUnverified

Current R&R by category

Whole-project rollup at the latest vintage per category: printed project-level rows are preferred, and mining areas are summed (tonnes-weighted grade) only where the issuer prints no project-level row. Per-area and per-source detail in the Current R&R table below.

Category	Tonnes (Mt)	Grade (g/t Au)	Contained (Moz Au)	As at
Measured	—	—	—	—
Indicated	27.00 Mt	1.30 g/t	1.10 Moz	30 June 2026
Inferred	6.50 Mt	1.20 g/t	0.24 Moz	30 June 2026
Total Resources	33.00 Mt	1.30 g/t	1.40 Moz	30 June 2026
Proved	—	—	—	—
Probable	—	—	—	—
Total Reserves	—	—	—	—

Cut-off grade

—

Price assumption

—

JORC code year

2012

Peer benchmark — developing Au projects (284 with resources)Resource size P61Resource grade P60View on grade-tonnage chart →

Percentile of this project's current total Resource among covered peers (P100 = largest / highest grade). Basis and Inferred toggles apply.

Data quality

Latest source: 2026 Resources and Reserves Statement · 30 June 2026
Reporting code: JORC 2012
Convention: inclusive
Currency assumption: A$
Disagreement flags: 10 rows

Current R&R

Resources

Area	Category	Tonnes (Mt)	Au		As at	Source	Provenance
Area	Category	Tonnes (Mt)	Grade (g/t Au)	Contained (Moz Au)	As at	Source	Provenance
Total	Indicated	27.00 Mt	1.30 g/t	1.10 Moz	30 June 2026	4Unverified Evidence record Rebecca Indicated · Au · as at 2026-06-30 Reported figure Area Whole project Basis 100% Ore tonnes (t) 27000000.0000 Grade 1.3000 Contained (oz) 1100000.0000 Classification Resource Source trail 2026 Resources and Reserves Statement 4 Published 2026-08-25 Verification Approved; not independently verified · Model extracted QA WARN: 2 rows share this exact identity in this document with CONFLICTING figures (sibling copies: t=17000000 g=1.5 conf=0.85). EITHER at most one matches the print (reject the fabricated copies), OR two DISTINCT printed lines collapsed onto one identity because an area label went missing (t63 White Rock: the deposit line and its group Total, both print-exact, on one empty-area key) — then restore the printed label of one copy (FIX mining_area) instead of rejecting — OR the copies come from differently YEAR-HEADED tables of a comparative filing (t67 NEM: every table prints at two year-ends and both copies are print-exact) — then FIX as_at_date to each copy's own table year instead of rejecting — OR both copies are print-exact and collided because a category/classification was mis-mapped (t71 EQX: per-classification Total rows all stored as total_resource) — then FIX category on the mis-mapped copy. QA WARN: figures within print rounding of a stored row of the same company/project/area/category under a DIFFERENT as-at date — likely a re-presentation (DFS / annual statement / global MRE restating an already-stored estimate, possibly at coarser rounding). Keep one operative copy; verify supersession before storing both. QA WARN: identical figures appear under ANOTHER project in this document — possible row-bleed (the model copying one project's printed line onto another). Verify each project's table prints these figures; reject the copy whose table does not. QA BLOCK: conflicting duplicate — this (project, mining area, commodity, classification, category, as-at date) appears 2 times in the document WITH DIFFERENT figures. At most one copy matches the print; verify each against the document and reject the rest (a copy whose figures appear nowhere in the text is fabricated). QA INFO: recompute differs 2.59% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±10.24% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled. \| QA approve (t119r): reconciled to the printed Table 13/14 figures; canonical project/deposit hierarchy applied \| t119r Copies a pre-filled issue record so you can send it through your normal channel.

notes (5)

Source: 2026 Resources and Reserves Statement · published 25 Aug 2026

Ref: 4

JORC 2012 — Reporting code of record: JORC 2012
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.

QA notes:

QA WARN: 2 rows share this exact identity in this document with CONFLICTING figures (sibling copies: t=17000000 g=1.5 conf=0.85). EITHER at most one matches the print (reject the fabricated copies), OR two DISTINCT printed lines collapsed onto one identity because an area label went missing (t63 White Rock: the deposit line and its group Total, both print-exact, on one empty-area key) — then restore the printed label of one copy (FIX mining_area) instead of rejecting — OR the copies come from differently YEAR-HEADED tables of a comparative filing (t67 NEM: every table prints at two year-ends and both copies are print-exact) — then FIX as_at_date to each copy's own table year instead of rejecting — OR both copies are print-exact and collided because a category/classification was mis-mapped (t71 EQX: per-classification Total rows all stored as total_resource) — then FIX category on the mis-mapped copy. QA WARN: figures within print rounding of a stored row of the same company/project/area/category under a DIFFERENT as-at date — likely a re-presentation (DFS / annual statement / global MRE restating an already-stored estimate, possibly at coarser rounding). Keep one operative copy; verify supersession before storing both. QA WARN: identical figures appear under ANOTHER project in this document — possible row-bleed (the model copying one project's printed line onto another). Verify each project's table prints these figures; reject the copy whose table does not. QA BLOCK: conflicting duplicate — this (project, mining area, commodity, classification, category, as-at date) appears 2 times in the document WITH DIFFERENT figures. At most one copy matches the print; verify each against the document and reject the rest (a copy whose figures appear nowhere in the text is fabricated). QA INFO: recompute differs 2.59% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±10.24% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled.
QA approve (t119r): reconciled to the printed Table 13/14 figures; canonical project/deposit hierarchy applied
t119r

Total

Inferred

6.50 Mt

1.20 g/t

0.24 Moz

30 June 2026

4Unverified

notes (5)

Source: 2026 Resources and Reserves Statement · published 25 Aug 2026

Ref: 4

JORC 2012 — Reporting code of record: JORC 2012
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.

QA notes:

QA INFO: inclusive-of-reserves flag cleared on an inferred row — reserves derive from M&I only, so the flag is meaningless on inferred. QA WARN: 2 rows share this exact identity in this document with CONFLICTING figures (sibling copies: t=3100000 g=1.4 conf=0.85). EITHER at most one matches the print (reject the fabricated copies), OR two DISTINCT printed lines collapsed onto one identity because an area label went missing (t63 White Rock: the deposit line and its group Total, both print-exact, on one empty-area key) — then restore the printed label of one copy (FIX mining_area) instead of rejecting — OR the copies come from differently YEAR-HEADED tables of a comparative filing (t67 NEM: every table prints at two year-ends and both copies are print-exact) — then FIX as_at_date to each copy's own table year instead of rejecting — OR both copies are print-exact and collided because a category/classification was mis-mapped (t71 EQX: per-classification Total rows all stored as total_resource) — then FIX category on the mis-mapped copy. QA WARN: figures within print rounding of a stored row of the same company/project/area/category under a DIFFERENT as-at date — likely a re-presentation (DFS / annual statement / global MRE restating an already-stored estimate, possibly at coarser rounding). Keep one operative copy; verify supersession before storing both. QA WARN: identical figures appear under ANOTHER project in this document — possible row-bleed (the model copying one project's printed line onto another). Verify each project's table prints these figures; reject the copy whose table does not. QA BLOCK: conflicting duplicate — this (project, mining area, commodity, classification, category, as-at date) appears 2 times in the document WITH DIFFERENT figures. At most one copy matches the print; verify each against the document and reject the rest (a copy whose figures appear nowhere in the text is fabricated). QA INFO: recompute differs 4.49% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±7.02% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled.

Total

Total Resources

33.00 Mt

1.30 g/t

1.40 Moz

30 June 2026

4Unverified

notes (5)

Source: 2026 Resources and Reserves Statement · published 25 Aug 2026

Ref: 4

JORC 2012 — Reporting code of record: JORC 2012
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.

QA notes:

QA WARN: 2 rows share this exact identity in this document with CONFLICTING figures (sibling copies: t=20000000 g=1.5 conf=0.85). EITHER at most one matches the print (reject the fabricated copies), OR two DISTINCT printed lines collapsed onto one identity because an area label went missing (t63 White Rock: the deposit line and its group Total, both print-exact, on one empty-area key) — then restore the printed label of one copy (FIX mining_area) instead of rejecting — OR the copies come from differently YEAR-HEADED tables of a comparative filing (t67 NEM: every table prints at two year-ends and both copies are print-exact) — then FIX as_at_date to each copy's own table year instead of rejecting — OR both copies are print-exact and collided because a category/classification was mis-mapped (t71 EQX: per-classification Total rows all stored as total_resource) — then FIX category on the mis-mapped copy. QA WARN: tonnes/contained equal the SUM of 4 already-APPROVED row(s) of the same project/classification/category/commodity (Rebecca deposit, Duchess deposit, Duke deposit, Cleo deposit) — a cross-document rollup whose component leaves were stored from another announcement (t58 CMM MGGP underground class). Approving it double-counts against the approved leaves; verify whether the print is a grouping line. QA WARN: figures within print rounding of a stored row of the same company/project/area/category under a DIFFERENT as-at date — likely a re-presentation (DFS / annual statement / global MRE restating an already-stored estimate, possibly at coarser rounding). Keep one operative copy; verify supersession before storing both. QA WARN: identical figures appear under ANOTHER project in this document — possible row-bleed (the model copying one project's printed line onto another). Verify each project's table prints these figures; reject the copy whose table does not. QA BLOCK: conflicting duplicate — this (project, mining area, commodity, classification, category, as-at date) appears 2 times in the document WITH DIFFERENT figures. At most one copy matches the print; verify each against the document and reject the rest (a copy whose figures appear nowhere in the text is fabricated). QA INFO: recompute differs 1.48% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±8.93% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled.

Duchess deposit

Indicated

7.30 Mt

0.90 g/t

0.22 Moz

30 June 2026

33Unverified

notes (5)

Source: 2026 Resources and Reserves Statement · published 25 Aug 2026

Ref: 33

Unknown code — Reporting code not yet captured for this row.
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.

QA notes:

QA WARN: tonnes AND contained match an approved estimate of this company filed under a DIFFERENT identity (project 'Rebecca', area 'Duchess deposit') — likely a cross-project re-presentation / umbrella-alias copy of that estimate; keep one operative copy under the established filing. QA WARN: identical figures appear under ANOTHER project in this document — possible row-bleed (the model copying one project's printed line onto another). Verify each project's table prints these figures; reject the copy whose table does not. QA INFO: recompute differs 3.99% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±8.51% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled.
QA approve (t119r): reconciled to the printed Table 13/14 figures; canonical project/deposit hierarchy applied
t119r

Duchess deposit

Inferred

2.40 Mt

0.90 g/t

0.07 Moz

30 June 2026

33Unverified

notes (5)

Source: 2026 Resources and Reserves Statement · published 25 Aug 2026

Ref: 33

Unknown code — Reporting code not yet captured for this row.
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.

QA notes:

QA INFO: inclusive-of-reserves flag cleared on an inferred row — reserves derive from M&I only, so the flag is meaningless on inferred. QA WARN: tonnes AND contained match an approved estimate of this company filed under a DIFFERENT identity (project 'Rebecca', area 'Duchess deposit') — likely a cross-project re-presentation / umbrella-alias copy of that estimate; keep one operative copy under the established filing. QA WARN: identical figures appear under ANOTHER project in this document — possible row-bleed (the model copying one project's printed line onto another). Verify each project's table prints these figures; reject the copy whose table does not. QA INFO: recompute differs 3.55% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±8.33% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled.
QA approve (t119r): reconciled to the printed Table 13/14 figures; canonical project/deposit hierarchy applied
t119r

Duchess deposit

Total Resources

9.70 Mt

0.90 g/t

0.29 Moz

30 June 2026

33Unverified

notes (5)

Source: 2026 Resources and Reserves Statement · published 25 Aug 2026

Ref: 33

Unknown code — Reporting code not yet captured for this row.
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.

QA notes:

QA WARN: cross-category subtotal — this total_resource row on area 'Duchess' equals the sum of the same area's indicated+inferred leaves — a per-deposit M&I/P&P-style total (t24 LUN/LUG NI 43-101 class). This can be an authoritative issuer-printed per-deposit total or an unhelpful intermediate subtotal. Verify the printed row: retain explicit deposit totals, but reject derived/unprinted or mid-tier rollups before approval. QA WARN: tonnes AND contained match an approved estimate of this company filed under a DIFFERENT identity (project 'Rebecca', area 'Duchess deposit') — likely a cross-project re-presentation / umbrella-alias copy of that estimate; keep one operative copy under the established filing. QA WARN: identical figures appear under ANOTHER project in this document — possible row-bleed (the model copying one project's printed line onto another). Verify each project's table prints these figures; reject the copy whose table does not. QA INFO: recompute differs 3.22% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±7.80% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled.
QA approve (t119r): reconciled to the printed Table 13/14 figures; canonical project/deposit hierarchy applied
t119r

Duke deposit

Indicated

2.00 Mt

1.10 g/t

0.07 Moz

30 June 2026

33Unverified

notes (5)

Source: 2026 Resources and Reserves Statement · published 25 Aug 2026

Ref: 33

Unknown code — Reporting code not yet captured for this row.
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.

QA notes:

QA WARN: tonnes AND contained match an approved estimate of this company filed under a DIFFERENT identity (project 'Rebecca', area 'Duke deposit') — likely a cross-project re-presentation / umbrella-alias copy of that estimate; keep one operative copy under the established filing. QA WARN: identical figures appear under ANOTHER project in this document — possible row-bleed (the model copying one project's printed line onto another). Verify each project's table prints these figures; reject the copy whose table does not. QA INFO: recompute differs 3.11% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±11.23% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled.
QA approve (t119r): reconciled to the printed Table 13/14 figures; canonical project/deposit hierarchy applied
t119r

Duke deposit

Inferred

0.74 Mt

1.10 g/t

0.03 Moz

30 June 2026

33Unverified

notes (5)

Source: 2026 Resources and Reserves Statement · published 25 Aug 2026

Ref: 33

Unknown code — Reporting code not yet captured for this row.
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.

QA notes:

QA INFO: inclusive-of-reserves flag cleared on an inferred row — reserves derive from M&I only, so the flag is meaningless on inferred. QA WARN: identical figures appear under ANOTHER project in this document — possible row-bleed (the model copying one project's printed line onto another). Verify each project's table prints these figures; reject the copy whose table does not. QA INFO: recompute differs 4.68% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±7.22% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled.
QA approve (t119r): reconciled to the printed Table 13/14 figures; canonical project/deposit hierarchy applied
t119r

Duke deposit

Total Resources

2.70 Mt

1.10 g/t

0.10 Moz

30 June 2026

33Unverified

notes (5)

Source: 2026 Resources and Reserves Statement · published 25 Aug 2026

Ref: 33

Unknown code — Reporting code not yet captured for this row.
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.

QA notes:

QA WARN: cross-category subtotal — this total_resource row on area 'Duke' equals the sum of the same area's indicated+inferred leaves — a per-deposit M&I/P&P-style total (t24 LUN/LUG NI 43-101 class). This can be an authoritative issuer-printed per-deposit total or an unhelpful intermediate subtotal. Verify the printed row: retain explicit deposit totals, but reject derived/unprinted or mid-tier rollups before approval. QA WARN: tonnes AND contained match an approved estimate of this company filed under a DIFFERENT identity (project 'Rebecca', area 'Duke deposit') — likely a cross-project re-presentation / umbrella-alias copy of that estimate; keep one operative copy under the established filing. QA WARN: identical figures appear under ANOTHER project in this document — possible row-bleed (the model copying one project's printed line onto another). Verify each project's table prints these figures; reject the copy whose table does not. QA INFO: recompute differs 2.56% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±6.91% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled.
QA approve (t119r): reconciled to the printed Table 13/14 figures; canonical project/deposit hierarchy applied
t119r

Rebecca deposit

Indicated

17.00 Mt

1.50 g/t

0.82 Moz

30 June 2026

33Unverified

notes (5)

Source: 2026 Resources and Reserves Statement · published 25 Aug 2026

Ref: 33

Unknown code — Reporting code not yet captured for this row.
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.

QA notes:

QA WARN: 2 rows share this exact identity in this document with CONFLICTING figures (sibling copies: t=27000000 g=1.3 conf=0.95). EITHER at most one matches the print (reject the fabricated copies), OR two DISTINCT printed lines collapsed onto one identity because an area label went missing (t63 White Rock: the deposit line and its group Total, both print-exact, on one empty-area key) — then restore the printed label of one copy (FIX mining_area) instead of rejecting — OR the copies come from differently YEAR-HEADED tables of a comparative filing (t67 NEM: every table prints at two year-ends and both copies are print-exact) — then FIX as_at_date to each copy's own table year instead of rejecting — OR both copies are print-exact and collided because a category/classification was mis-mapped (t71 EQX: per-classification Total rows all stored as total_resource) — then FIX category on the mis-mapped copy. QA WARN: tonnes AND contained match an approved estimate of this company filed under a DIFFERENT identity (project 'Rebecca', area 'Rebecca deposit') — likely a cross-project re-presentation / umbrella-alias copy of that estimate; keep one operative copy under the established filing. QA WARN: figures within print rounding of a stored row of the same company/project/area/category under a DIFFERENT as-at date — likely a re-presentation (DFS / annual statement / global MRE restating an already-stored estimate, possibly at coarser rounding). Keep one operative copy; verify supersession before storing both. QA WARN: identical figures appear under ANOTHER project in this document — possible row-bleed (the model copying one project's printed line onto another). Verify each project's table prints these figures; reject the copy whose table does not. QA BLOCK: conflicting duplicate — this (project, mining area, commodity, classification, category, as-at date) appears 2 times in the document WITH DIFFERENT figures. At most one copy matches the print; verify each against the document and reject the rest (a copy whose figures appear nowhere in the text is fabricated).

Rebecca deposit

Inferred

3.10 Mt

1.40 g/t

0.14 Moz

30 June 2026

33Unverified

notes (5)

Source: 2026 Resources and Reserves Statement · published 25 Aug 2026

Ref: 33

Unknown code — Reporting code not yet captured for this row.
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.

QA notes:

QA INFO: inclusive-of-reserves flag cleared on an inferred row — reserves derive from M&I only, so the flag is meaningless on inferred. QA WARN: 2 rows share this exact identity in this document with CONFLICTING figures (sibling copies: t=6500000 g=1.2 conf=0.95). EITHER at most one matches the print (reject the fabricated copies), OR two DISTINCT printed lines collapsed onto one identity because an area label went missing (t63 White Rock: the deposit line and its group Total, both print-exact, on one empty-area key) — then restore the printed label of one copy (FIX mining_area) instead of rejecting — OR the copies come from differently YEAR-HEADED tables of a comparative filing (t67 NEM: every table prints at two year-ends and both copies are print-exact) — then FIX as_at_date to each copy's own table year instead of rejecting — OR both copies are print-exact and collided because a category/classification was mis-mapped (t71 EQX: per-classification Total rows all stored as total_resource) — then FIX category on the mis-mapped copy. QA WARN: tonnes AND contained match an approved estimate of this company filed under a DIFFERENT identity (project 'Rebecca', area 'Rebecca deposit') — likely a cross-project re-presentation / umbrella-alias copy of that estimate; keep one operative copy under the established filing. QA WARN: figures within print rounding of a stored row of the same company/project/area/category under a DIFFERENT as-at date — likely a re-presentation (DFS / annual statement / global MRE restating an already-stored estimate, possibly at coarser rounding). Keep one operative copy; verify supersession before storing both. QA WARN: identical figures appear under ANOTHER project in this document — possible row-bleed (the model copying one project's printed line onto another). Verify each project's table prints these figures; reject the copy whose table does not. QA BLOCK: conflicting duplicate — this (project, mining area, commodity, classification, category, as-at date) appears 2 times in the document WITH DIFFERENT figures. At most one copy matches the print; verify each against the document and reject the rest (a copy whose figures appear nowhere in the text is fabricated).

Rebecca deposit

Total Resources

20.00 Mt

1.50 g/t

0.96 Moz

30 June 2026

33Unverified

notes (5)

Source: 2026 Resources and Reserves Statement · published 25 Aug 2026

Ref: 33

Unknown code — Reporting code not yet captured for this row.
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.

QA notes:

QA WARN: 2 rows share this exact identity in this document with CONFLICTING figures (sibling copies: t=33000000 g=1.3 conf=0.95). EITHER at most one matches the print (reject the fabricated copies), OR two DISTINCT printed lines collapsed onto one identity because an area label went missing (t63 White Rock: the deposit line and its group Total, both print-exact, on one empty-area key) — then restore the printed label of one copy (FIX mining_area) instead of rejecting — OR the copies come from differently YEAR-HEADED tables of a comparative filing (t67 NEM: every table prints at two year-ends and both copies are print-exact) — then FIX as_at_date to each copy's own table year instead of rejecting — OR both copies are print-exact and collided because a category/classification was mis-mapped (t71 EQX: per-classification Total rows all stored as total_resource) — then FIX category on the mis-mapped copy. QA WARN: tonnes AND contained match an approved estimate of this company filed under a DIFFERENT identity (project 'Rebecca', area 'Rebecca deposit') — likely a cross-project re-presentation / umbrella-alias copy of that estimate; keep one operative copy under the established filing. QA WARN: figures within print rounding of a stored row of the same company/project/area/category under a DIFFERENT as-at date — likely a re-presentation (DFS / annual statement / global MRE restating an already-stored estimate, possibly at coarser rounding). Keep one operative copy; verify supersession before storing both. QA WARN: identical figures appear under ANOTHER project in this document — possible row-bleed (the model copying one project's printed line onto another). Verify each project's table prints these figures; reject the copy whose table does not. QA BLOCK: conflicting duplicate — this (project, mining area, commodity, classification, category, as-at date) appears 2 times in the document WITH DIFFERENT figures. At most one copy matches the print; verify each against the document and reject the rest (a copy whose figures appear nowhere in the text is fabricated).