These choices persist and are added to shared URLs.
Agate Creek
Queensland, Australia · Exploring · 100.0% ownedUnverified
Current R&R by category
Whole-project rollup at the latest vintage per category: printed project-level rows are preferred, and mining areas are summed (tonnes-weighted grade) only where the issuer prints no project-level row. Per-area and per-source detail in the Current R&R table below.
Category
Tonnes (Mt)
Grade (g/t Au)
Contained (Moz Au)
As at
Measured
0.36 Mt
1.70 g/t
0.02 Moz
02 July 2026
Indicated
9.03 Mt
0.93 g/t
0.27 Moz
02 July 2026
Inferred
6.09 Mt
0.68 g/t
0.13 Moz
02 July 2026
Total Resources
15.49 Mt
0.85 g/t
0.42 Moz
02 July 2026
Proved
0.09 Mt
3.30 g/t
0.01 Moz
13 Aug 2025
Probable
0.37 Mt
2.30 g/t
0.03 Moz
13 Aug 2025
Total Reserves
0.46 Mt
2.50 g/t
0.04 Moz
13 Aug 2025
Cut-off grade
0.3000 g/t Au · 1.3000 g/t Au
Price assumption
A$3750.00/oz
JORC code year
2012
Peer benchmark — exploring Au projects (297 with resources)Resource size P50Resource grade P37View on grade-tonnage chart →
Percentile of this project's current total Resource among covered peers (P100 = largest / highest grade). Basis and Inferred toggles apply.
Cutoff 0.30 g/t Au — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
QA notes:
QA INFO: recompute differs 1.62% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained are only good to ±8.94% (rounding granularity) — treated as reconciled.
Cutoff 0.30 g/t Au — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA INFO: recompute differs 2.77% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained are only good to ±2.93% (rounding granularity) — treated as reconciled.
QA approved: verified against the source print by the tranche-23 agent pass
Cutoff 0.30 g/t Au — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA INFO: recompute differs 1.01% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained are only good to ±1.43% (rounding granularity) — treated as reconciled.
QA approved: verified against the source print by the tranche-23 agent pass
Cutoff 0.30 g/t Au — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA INFO: recompute differs 22.17% from the printed contained figure, but the print is exactly consistent with the recompute at the printed tonnes/grade/contained granularity (rounding-interval overlap) — treated as reconciled.
QA approved: verified against the source print by the tranche-23 agent pass
Cutoff 1.30 g/t Au — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
@ A$ 3,750/oz — Metal price assumption used to derive this estimate.
QA notes:
QA WARN: tonnes/contained equal the SUM of 3 sibling row(s) of the same classification/category/commodity (Sherwood West Pit 1, Sherwood West Pit 3, Sherwood Pit 6) — likely a printed multi-deposit rollup/subtotal. Policy keeps leaf rows and printed whole-project Totals only; reject mid-level rollups (double-count).
QA approved: verified against the source print by the tranche-23 agent pass
Rows are hierarchical, not additive — do not sum a column across rows. Whole-project rows (Area “Total”) already contain the indented named-area rows beneath them, and an issuer's printed per-deposit total can itself contain other listed areas. All derived totals and rollups on this site already exclude the overlapping rows.
JORC 2012 — Reporting code of record: JORC 2012
Cutoff 1.30 g/t Au — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
@ A$ 3,750/oz — Metal price assumption used to derive this estimate.
QA notes:
QA approved: verified against the source print by the tranche-23 agent pass
Ref: 10
JORC 2012 — Reporting code of record: JORC 2012
Cutoff 1.30 g/t Au — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
@ A$ 3,750/oz — Metal price assumption used to derive this estimate.
QA notes:
QA approved: verified against the source print by the tranche-23 agent pass
Ref: 10
JORC 2012 — Reporting code of record: JORC 2012
Cutoff 1.30 g/t Au — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
@ A$ 3,750/oz — Metal price assumption used to derive this estimate.
QA notes:
QA INFO: recompute differs 1.73% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained are only good to ±2.95% (rounding granularity) — treated as reconciled.
QA approved: verified against the source print by the tranche-23 agent pass
Ref: 10
JORC 2012 — Reporting code of record: JORC 2012
Cutoff 1.30 g/t Au — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
@ A$ 3,750/oz — Metal price assumption used to derive this estimate.
QA notes:
QA INFO: recompute differs 2.85% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained are only good to ±2.76% (rounding granularity) — treated as reconciled.
QA approved: verified against the source print by the tranche-23 agent pass
JORC 2012 — Reporting code of record: JORC 2012
Cutoff 1.30 g/t Au — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
@ A$ 3,750/oz — Metal price assumption used to derive this estimate.
QA notes:
QA approved: verified against the source print by the tranche-23 agent pass
— Reporting code of record: JORC 2012
Cutoff 1.30 g/t Au — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
@ A$ 3,750/oz — Metal price assumption used to derive this estimate.
QA notes:
QA approved: verified against the source print by the tranche-23 agent pass
Ref: 10
JORC 2012 — Reporting code of record: JORC 2012
Cutoff 1.30 g/t Au — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
@ A$ 3,750/oz — Metal price assumption used to derive this estimate.
QA notes:
QA INFO: recompute differs 2.37% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained are only good to ±3.52% (rounding granularity) — treated as reconciled.
QA approved: verified against the source print by the tranche-23 agent pass
JORC 2012 — Reporting code of record: JORC 2012
Cutoff 1.30 g/t Au — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
@ A$ 3,750/oz — Metal price assumption used to derive this estimate.
QA notes:
QA approved: verified against the source print by the tranche-23 agent pass
— Reporting code of record: JORC 2012
Cutoff 1.30 g/t Au — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
@ A$ 3,750/oz — Metal price assumption used to derive this estimate.
QA notes:
QA approved: verified against the source print by the tranche-23 agent pass
JORC 2012 — Reporting code of record: JORC 2012
Cutoff 1.30 g/t Au — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
@ A$ 3,750/oz — Metal price assumption used to derive this estimate.
QA notes:
QA approved: verified against the source print by the tranche-23 agent pass
Ref: 10
JORC 2012 — Reporting code of record: JORC 2012
Cutoff 1.30 g/t Au — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
@ A$ 3,750/oz — Metal price assumption used to derive this estimate.
QA notes:
QA INFO: recompute differs 3.53% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained are only good to ±11.75% (rounding granularity) — treated as reconciled.
QA approved: verified against the source print by the tranche-23 agent pass
Ref: 10
JORC 2012 — Reporting code of record: JORC 2012
Cutoff 1.30 g/t Au — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
@ A$ 3,750/oz — Metal price assumption used to derive this estimate.
QA notes:
QA INFO: recompute differs 1.54% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained are only good to ±9.42% (rounding granularity) — treated as reconciled.
QA approved: verified against the source print by the tranche-23 agent pass
· published 03 Sept 2025
Ref: 10
JORC 2012 — Reporting code of record: JORC 2012
Cutoff 1.30 g/t Au — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
@ A$ 3,750/oz — Metal price assumption used to derive this estimate.
QA notes:
QA INFO: recompute differs 2.22% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained are only good to ±3.84% (rounding granularity) — treated as reconciled.
QA approved: verified against the source print by the tranche-23 agent pass