These choices persist and are added to shared URLs.
Xavantina Operations
Brazil · ProducingUnverified
Current R&R by category
Whole-project rollup at the latest vintage per category: printed project-level rows are preferred, and mining areas are summed (tonnes-weighted grade) only where the issuer prints no project-level row. Per-area and per-source detail in the Current R&R table below.
Category
Tonnes (Mt)
Grade (g/t Au)
Contained (Moz Au)
As at
Measured
0.31 Mt
8.05 g/t
0.08 Moz
30 June 2025
Indicated
2.05 Mt
8.86 g/t
0.58 Moz
30 June 2025
Inferred
1.17 Mt
9.75 g/t
0.37 Moz
30 June 2025
Total Resources
1.43 Mt
12.26 g/t
0.56 Moz
30 June 2025
Proved
0.22 Mt
6.48 g/t
0.05 Moz
30 June 2025
Probable
1.88 Mt
6.97 g/t
0.42 Moz
30 June 2025
Total Reserves
2.10 Mt
6.92 g/t
0.47 Moz
30 June 2025
Sub-category rows are as disclosed (no Reserves-treatment netting); the Total rows honour the Resources treatment and Inferred-policy toggles, so components may not sum to the Total.
Dotted tonnes/grade are derived under the active Resources treatment: tonnes are netted of (or grossed by) the reserve tonnage alongside contained, and grade is re-derived as netted contained ÷ netted tonnes — not the published figures.
Cut-off grade
1.4600 g/t Au · 3.4300 g/t Au
Price assumption
US$2500.00/oz · US$2100.00/oz
JORC code year
—
Peer benchmark — producing Au projects (282 with resources)Resource size P29Resource grade P96View on grade-tonnage chart →
Percentile of this project's current total Resource among covered peers (P100 = largest / highest grade). Basis and Inferred toggles apply.
Cutoff 1.46 g/t Au — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
@ US$ 2,500/oz — Metal price assumption used to derive this estimate.
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA INFO: recompute differs 1.48% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained are only good to ±2.10% (rounding granularity) — treated as reconciled.
tranche11c QA: verified against printed source table
Rows are hierarchical, not additive — do not sum a column across rows. Whole-project rows (Area “Total”) already contain the indented named-area rows beneath them, and an issuer's printed per-deposit total can itself contain other listed areas. All derived totals and rollups on this site already exclude the overlapping rows.
Dotted Total-row tonnes/grade are derived under the active Resources treatment: tonnes netted of (or grossed by) the reserve tonnage alongside contained, grade re-derived as netted contained ÷ netted tonnes — not the published figures.
Ref: Table 1-2: Mineral Reserve Estimate — Total Probable Reserve
SK-1300 — Reporting code of record: SK-1300
Cutoff 3.43 g/t Au — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
@ US$ 2,100/oz — Metal price assumption used to derive this estimate.
QA notes:
tranche11c QA: verified against printed source table
· published 30 Mar 2026
Ref: Table 1-2: Mineral Reserve Estimate — Total Proven and Probable Reserve
SK-1300 — Reporting code of record: SK-1300
Cutoff 3.43 g/t Au — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
@ US$ 2,100/oz — Metal price assumption used to derive this estimate.
QA notes:
tranche11c QA: verified against printed source table
SK-1300
— Reporting code of record: SK-1300
Cutoff 3.43 g/t Au — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
@ US$ 2,100/oz — Metal price assumption used to derive this estimate.
QA notes:
tranche11c QA: verified against printed source table
SK-1300
— Reporting code of record: SK-1300
Cutoff 3.43 g/t Au — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
@ US$ 2,100/oz — Metal price assumption used to derive this estimate.
QA notes:
tranche11c QA: verified against printed source table
SK-1300 — Reporting code of record: SK-1300
Cutoff 3.43 g/t Au — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
@ US$ 2,100/oz — Metal price assumption used to derive this estimate.
QA notes:
tranche11c QA: verified against printed source table