These choices persist and are added to shared URLs.
Edikan
Ghana · Producing · 90.0% ownedManual entry
Current R&R by category
Whole-project rollup at the latest vintage per category: printed project-level rows are preferred, and mining areas are summed (tonnes-weighted grade) only where the issuer prints no project-level row. Per-area and per-source detail in the Current R&R table below.
Category
Tonnes (Mt)
Grade (g/t Au)
Contained (Moz Au)
As at
Measured
21.20 Mt
0.89 g/t
0.60 Moz
30 June 2026
Indicated
68.20 Mt
0.88 g/t
1.92 Moz
30 June 2026
M&I = Measured + Indicated (overlaps both)
89.40 Mt
0.88 g/t
2.53 Moz
30 June 2026
Inferred
16.70 Mt
1.00 g/t
0.54 Moz
30 June 2026
Total Resources
42.00 Mt
0.81 g/t
1.09 Moz
30 June 2026
Proved
12.70 Mt
0.87 g/t
0.36 Moz
30 June 2026
Probable
20.20 Mt
0.99 g/t
0.64 Moz
30 June 2026
Total Reserves
32.90 Mt
0.94 g/t
1.00 Moz
30 June 2026
M&I is the issuer's printed Measured + Indicated subtotal — it overlaps the Measured and Indicated rows and is never added alongside them; the Total rows and every rollup already exclude it.
Sub-category rows are as disclosed (no Reserves-treatment netting); the Total rows honour the Resources treatment and Inferred-policy toggles, so components may not sum to the Total.
Dotted tonnes/grade are derived under the active Resources treatment: tonnes are netted of (or grossed by) the reserve tonnage alongside contained, and grade is re-derived as netted contained ÷ netted tonnes — not the published figures.
Cut-off grade
0.4000 g/t Au · 0.3000 g/t Au · 0.3500 g/t Au · 0.8000 g/t Au · 1.1000 g/t Au
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA WARN: tonnes/contained equal the SUM of 4 already-APPROVED row(s) of the same project/classification/category/commodity (whole-project, AF Gap, Esuajah North, Fetish) — a cross-document rollup whose component leaves were stored from another announcement (t58 CMM MGGP underground class). Approving it double-counts against the approved leaves; verify whether the print is a grouping line.
QA approve (t118v): all 125 stored PRU rows reconciled to Tables 7-14; 68 deposit identities corrected, numeric values and dates verified
QA INFO: inclusive-of-reserves flag cleared on an inferred row — reserves derive from M&I only, so the flag is meaningless on inferred. QA INFO: recompute differs 1.30% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±5.39% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled.
QA approve (t118v): all 125 stored PRU rows reconciled to Tables 7-14; 68 deposit identities corrected, numeric values and dates verified
Cutoff 0.30 g/t Au — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA INFO: recompute differs 1.05% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±2.28% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled.
QA correction: Deposit column identity 'Esuajah North Open Pit' -> 'Esuajah North'; the separate Deposit Type/Mining Method is not part of the stable deposit name
QA approve (t118v): all 125 stored PRU rows reconciled to Tables 7-14; 68 deposit identities corrected, numeric values and dates verified
Cutoff 0.30 g/t Au — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA correction: Deposit column identity 'Esuajah North Open Pit' -> 'Esuajah North'; the separate Deposit Type/Mining Method is not part of the stable deposit name
QA approve (t118v): all 125 stored PRU rows reconciled to Tables 7-14; 68 deposit identities corrected, numeric values and dates verified
Cutoff 0.30 g/t Au — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA correction: Deposit column identity 'Esuajah North Open Pit' -> 'Esuajah North'; the separate Deposit Type/Mining Method is not part of the stable deposit name
QA approve (t118v): all 125 stored PRU rows reconciled to Tables 7-14; 68 deposit identities corrected, numeric values and dates verified
Cutoff 0.30 g/t Au — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
QA notes:
QA INFO: inclusive-of-reserves flag cleared on an inferred row — reserves derive from M&I only, so the flag is meaningless on inferred. QA INFO: recompute differs 13.44% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±15.00% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled.
QA correction: Deposit column identity 'Esuajah North Open Pit' -> 'Esuajah North'; the separate Deposit Type/Mining Method is not part of the stable deposit name
QA approve (t118v): all 125 stored PRU rows reconciled to Tables 7-14; 68 deposit identities corrected, numeric values and dates verified
Cutoff 0.40 g/t Au — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
QA notes:
QA INFO: inclusive-of-reserves flag cleared on an inferred row — reserves derive from M&I only, so the flag is meaningless on inferred. QA INFO: recompute differs 4.88% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±7.68% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled.
QA correction: Deposit column identity 'Fetish Open Pit' -> 'Fetish'; the separate Deposit Type/Mining Method is not part of the stable deposit name
QA approve (t118v): all 125 stored PRU rows reconciled to Tables 7-14; 68 deposit identities corrected, numeric values and dates verified
Cutoff 0.30 g/t Au — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
QA notes:
QA INFO: inclusive-of-reserves flag cleared on an inferred row — reserves derive from M&I only, so the flag is meaningless on inferred. QA INFO: recompute differs 2.68% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±10.92% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled.
QA correction: Deposit column identity 'Nkosuo Open Pit' -> 'Nkosuo'; the separate Deposit Type/Mining Method is not part of the stable deposit name
QA approve (t118v): all 125 stored PRU rows reconciled to Tables 7-14; 68 deposit identities corrected, numeric values and dates verified
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA INFO: recompute differs 1.06% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±2.95% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled.
QA approve (t118v): all 125 stored PRU rows reconciled to Tables 7-14; 68 deposit identities corrected, numeric values and dates verified
inc — Stated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. Set Resources: Excl. Reserves to net them out.
QA notes:
QA INFO: recompute differs 1.06% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±2.95% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled.
QA approve (t118v): all 125 stored PRU rows reconciled to Tables 7-14; 68 deposit identities corrected, numeric values and dates verified
@ US$ 3,000/oz — Metal price assumption used to derive this estimate.
QA notes:
QA WARN: tonnes/contained equal the SUM of 3 already-APPROVED row(s) of the same project/classification/category/commodity (Esuajah North, Fetish, whole-project) — a cross-document rollup whose component leaves were stored from another announcement (t58 CMM MGGP underground class). Approving it double-counts against the approved leaves; verify whether the print is a grouping line.
QA approve (t118v): all 125 stored PRU rows reconciled to Tables 7-14; 68 deposit identities corrected, numeric values and dates verified
Rows are hierarchical, not additive — do not sum a column across rows. Whole-project rows (Area “Total”) already contain the indented named-area rows beneath them, and an issuer's printed per-deposit total can itself contain other listed areas. “M&I” is the issuer's printed Measured + Indicated subtotal: it overlaps the Measured and Indicated rows and is never added alongside them. All derived totals and rollups on this site already exclude the overlapping rows.
Dotted Total-row tonnes/grade are derived under the active Resources treatment: tonnes netted of (or grossed by) the reserve tonnage alongside contained, grade re-derived as netted contained ÷ netted tonnes — not the published figures.
Figures are on a 100% project basis unless a row carries the attrib chip; Perseus Mining Limited Ordinary Shares holds 90.0% of this project.
Ref: 3
JORC 2012 — Reporting code of record: JORC 2012
@ US$ 3,000/oz — Metal price assumption used to derive this estimate.
QA notes:
QA approve (t118v): all 125 stored PRU rows reconciled to Tables 7-14; 68 deposit identities corrected, numeric values and dates verified
t118v
· published 26 Aug 2026
Ref: 3
JORC 2012 — Reporting code of record: JORC 2012
@ US$ 3,000/oz — Metal price assumption used to derive this estimate.
QA notes:
QA approve (t118v): all 125 stored PRU rows reconciled to Tables 7-14; 68 deposit identities corrected, numeric values and dates verified
t118v
JORC 2012 — Reporting code of record: JORC 2012
Cutoff 0.30 g/t Au — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
@ US$ 2,100/oz — Metal price assumption used to derive this estimate.
QA notes:
QA INFO: recompute differs 2.88% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained are only good to ±6.52% (rounding granularity) — treated as reconciled.
QA approved: verified against the source print by the tranche-21 agent pass
Ref:
JORC 2012 — Reporting code of record: JORC 2012
Cutoff 0.30 g/t Au — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
@ US$ 2,100/oz — Metal price assumption used to derive this estimate.
QA notes:
QA INFO: recompute differs 2.88% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained are only good to ±6.52% (rounding granularity) — treated as reconciled.
QA approved: verified against the source print by the tranche-21 agent pass
Cutoff 0.35 g/t Au — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
@ US$ 3,000/oz — Metal price assumption used to derive this estimate.
QA notes:
QA WARN: tonnes AND contained match an approved estimate of this company filed under a DIFFERENT identity (project 'Edikan', area 'AG Annex') — likely a cross-project re-presentation / umbrella-alias copy of that estimate; keep one operative copy under the established filing. QA INFO: recompute differs 6.12% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±12.68% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled.
QA correction: Deposit column identity 'AG Annex Open Pit' -> 'AG Annex'; the separate Deposit Type/Mining Method is not part of the stable deposit name
QA approve (t118v): all 125 stored PRU rows reconciled to Tables 7-14; 68 deposit identities corrected, numeric values and dates verified
Cutoff 0.35 g/t Au — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
@ US$ 3,000/oz — Metal price assumption used to derive this estimate.
QA notes:
QA WARN: tonnes AND contained match an approved estimate of this company filed under a DIFFERENT identity (project 'Edikan', area 'AG Annex') — likely a cross-project re-presentation / umbrella-alias copy of that estimate; keep one operative copy under the established filing. QA INFO: recompute differs 5.01% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±11.31% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled.
QA correction: Deposit column identity 'AG Annex Open Pit' -> 'AG Annex'; the separate Deposit Type/Mining Method is not part of the stable deposit name
QA approve (t118v): all 125 stored PRU rows reconciled to Tables 7-14; 68 deposit identities corrected, numeric values and dates verified
t118v
Unknown code — Reporting code not yet captured for this row.
QA notes:
QA capture (t118v): source-verified printed row omitted by the model/canonicalizer; page 16: AG Annex
Cutoff 0.30 g/t Au — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
@ US$ 3,000/oz — Metal price assumption used to derive this estimate.
QA notes:
QA INFO: recompute differs 1.05% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±2.99% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled.
QA correction: Deposit column identity 'Esuajah North Open Pit' -> 'Esuajah North'; the separate Deposit Type/Mining Method is not part of the stable deposit name
QA approve (t118v): all 125 stored PRU rows reconciled to Tables 7-14; 68 deposit identities corrected, numeric values and dates verified
Cutoff 0.30 g/t Au — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
@ US$ 3,000/oz — Metal price assumption used to derive this estimate.
QA notes:
QA INFO: recompute differs 1.27% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±7.83% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled.
QA correction: Deposit column identity 'Esuajah North Open Pit' -> 'Esuajah North'; the separate Deposit Type/Mining Method is not part of the stable deposit name
QA approve (t118v): all 125 stored PRU rows reconciled to Tables 7-14; 68 deposit identities corrected, numeric values and dates verified
t118v
Ref:
Unknown code — Reporting code not yet captured for this row.
QA notes:
QA capture (t118v): source-verified printed row omitted by the model/canonicalizer; page 16: Esuajah North
Proved & Probable
7.6 Mt
0.71 g/t
172 koz
t118v
· published 26 Aug 2026
Ref: 16
JORC 2012 — Reporting code of record: JORC 2012
Cutoff 1.10 g/t Au — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
@ US$ 3,000/oz — Metal price assumption used to derive this estimate.
QA notes:
QA INFO: recompute differs 1.18% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±2.50% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled.
QA approve (t118v): all 125 stored PRU rows reconciled to Tables 7-14; 68 deposit identities corrected, numeric values and dates verified
t118v
Ref: 16
JORC 2012 — Reporting code of record: JORC 2012
Cutoff 1.10 g/t Au — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
@ US$ 3,000/oz — Metal price assumption used to derive this estimate.
QA notes:
QA BLOCK: recomputed contained 272638.3309 oz vs reported 219000 oz (24.49% disagreement)
QA approve (t118v): all 125 stored PRU rows reconciled to Tables 7-14; 68 deposit identities corrected, numeric values and dates verified
t118v
Ref: 16
Unknown code — Reporting code not yet captured for this row.
QA notes:
QA capture (t118v): source-verified printed row omitted by the model/canonicalizer; page 16: Esuajah South
Proved & Probable
6.8 Mt
1.61 g/t
352 koz
t118v
Ref: 16
JORC 2012 — Reporting code of record: JORC 2012
Cutoff 0.40 g/t Au — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
@ US$ 3,000/oz — Metal price assumption used to derive this estimate.
QA notes:
QA correction: Deposit column identity 'Fetish Open Pit' -> 'Fetish'; the separate Deposit Type/Mining Method is not part of the stable deposit name
QA approve (t118v): all 125 stored PRU rows reconciled to Tables 7-14; 68 deposit identities corrected, numeric values and dates verified
t118v
Ref: 16
JORC 2012 — Reporting code of record: JORC 2012
Cutoff 0.40 g/t Au — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
@ US$ 3,000/oz — Metal price assumption used to derive this estimate.
QA notes:
QA correction: Deposit column identity 'Fetish Open Pit' -> 'Fetish'; the separate Deposit Type/Mining Method is not part of the stable deposit name
QA approve (t118v): all 125 stored PRU rows reconciled to Tables 7-14; 68 deposit identities corrected, numeric values and dates verified
t118v
Unknown code — Reporting code not yet captured for this row.
QA notes:
QA capture (t118v): source-verified printed row omitted by the model/canonicalizer; page 16: Fetish
Proved & Probable
7.0 Mt
0.85 g/t
191 koz
t118v
Ref: 16
JORC 2012 — Reporting code of record: JORC 2012
Cutoff 0.30 g/t Au — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
@ US$ 3,000/oz — Metal price assumption used to derive this estimate.
QA notes:
QA correction: Deposit column identity 'Nkosuo Open Pit' -> 'Nkosuo'; the separate Deposit Type/Mining Method is not part of the stable deposit name
QA approve (t118v): all 125 stored PRU rows reconciled to Tables 7-14; 68 deposit identities corrected, numeric values and dates verified
Cutoff 0.30 g/t Au — Cut-off grade assumption from the source statement.
@ US$ 3,000/oz — Metal price assumption used to derive this estimate.
QA notes:
QA WARN: cross-category subtotal — this total_reserve row on area 'Nkosuo Open Pit' equals the sum of the same area's probable leaves — a per-deposit M&I/P&P-style total (t24 LUN/LUG NI 43-101 class). Policy keeps category leaves + the whole-project Total; adjudicate per the per-property-totals precedent before approval.
QA correction: Deposit column identity 'Nkosuo Open Pit' -> 'Nkosuo'; the separate Deposit Type/Mining Method is not part of the stable deposit name
QA approve (t118v): all 125 stored PRU rows reconciled to Tables 7-14; 68 deposit identities corrected, numeric values and dates verified
t118v
JORC 2012 — Reporting code of record: JORC 2012
@ US$ 2,100/oz — Metal price assumption used to derive this estimate.
QA notes:
QA INFO: recompute differs 1.66% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained are only good to ±1.83% (rounding granularity) — treated as reconciled.
QA approved: verified against the source print by the tranche-21 agent pass
Ref: 16
JORC 2012 — Reporting code of record: JORC 2012
@ US$ 2,100/oz — Metal price assumption used to derive this estimate.
QA notes:
QA INFO: recompute differs 1.66% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained are only good to ±1.83% (rounding granularity) — treated as reconciled.
QA approved: verified against the source print by the tranche-21 agent pass
· published 26 Aug 2026
Ref: 16
JORC 2012 — Reporting code of record: JORC 2012
@ US$ 3,000/oz — Metal price assumption used to derive this estimate.
QA notes:
QA INFO: recompute differs 1.06% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±2.95% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled.
QA approve (t118v): all 125 stored PRU rows reconciled to Tables 7-14; 68 deposit identities corrected, numeric values and dates verified
@ US$ 3,000/oz — Metal price assumption used to derive this estimate.
QA notes:
QA WARN: cross-category subtotal — this total_reserve row on area 'Stockpiles' equals the sum of the same area's proved leaves — a per-deposit M&I/P&P-style total (t24 LUN/LUG NI 43-101 class). Policy keeps category leaves + the whole-project Total; adjudicate per the per-property-totals precedent before approval. QA INFO: recompute differs 1.06% from the printed contained figure, but the printed tonnes/grade/contained carry ±2.95% rounding granularity (capped per component; the true half-step band of coarse prints is wider) and the remainder sits under the warn threshold — treated as reconciled.
QA approve (t118v): all 125 stored PRU rows reconciled to Tables 7-14; 68 deposit identities corrected, numeric values and dates verified