View settings100% · M+I+I · Resources excl. reserves · Native commodities

Reporting assumptions

These choices persist and are added to shared URLs.

Ownership basis

Show the full project inventory before ownership adjustment.

Display scale

Display contained quantities in millions of ounces or tonnes.

Resource treatment

Normalise Resources to exclude Reserves: where a project is flagged inclusive, net Reserves out of Resources so the figure is additional Resources beyond Reserves. Unknown-convention rows are shown as stated.

Resource total

Total Resource includes Inferred (JORC convention). Totals are re-derived from category rows wherever the document discloses them.

Recovery basis

Show the issuer's headline recoverable figure as reported. Lithium-brine reserves already have the brine-processing recovery factor applied; everything else is shown as stated.

Commodity view

Primary view: each commodity in its own contained unit (oz / t).

Eureka

Alaska, USA · Exploring · 100.0% ownedUnverified

Current R&R by category

Whole-project rollup at the latest vintage per category: printed project-level rows are preferred, and mining areas are summed (tonnes-weighted grade) only where the issuer prints no project-level row. Per-area and per-source detail in the Current R&R table below.

Category	Tonnes (Mt)	Grade (% Fe)	Contained (Mt Fe)	As at
Measured	—	—	—	—
Indicated	1,190.00 Mt	9.87%	117.00 Mt Fe	10 Mar 2025
Inferred	2,087.00 Mt	9.80%	205.00 Mt Fe	10 Mar 2025
Total Resources	3,277.00 Mt	9.83%	322.00 Mt Fe	10 Mar 2025
Proved	—	—	—	—
Probable	—	—	—	—
Total Reserves	—	—	—	—

Cut-off grade

—

Price assumption

—

JORC code year

—

Peer benchmark — exploring Fe projects (18 with resources)Resource size P58Resource grade P19View on grade-tonnage chart →

Percentile of this project's current total Resource among covered peers (P100 = largest / highest grade). Basis and Inferred toggles apply.

Data quality

Latest source: Alaska Energy Metals Files Updated NI 43-101 Technical Report for The Eureka Deposit, Nikolai Nickel Project, Alaska, USA · 10 Mar 2025
Reporting code: unknown
Convention: unknown
Currency assumption: US$

Current R&R

Resources

Category	Tonnes (Mt)	Fe		As at	Source	Provenance
Category	Tonnes (Mt)	Grade (% Fe)	Contained (Mt Fe)	As at	Source	Provenance
Indicated	1,190.00 Mt	9.87%	117.00 Mt Fe	10 Mar 2025	Highlights of the Updated Technical Report and Mineral Resource EstimateUnverified Evidence record Eureka Indicated · Fe · as at 2025-03-10 Reported figure Area Whole project Basis 100% Ore tonnes (t) 1190000000.0000 Grade 9.8700 Contained (t Fe) 117000000.0000 Classification Resource Source trail Alaska Energy Metals Files Updated NI 43-101 Technical Report for The Eureka Deposit, Nikolai Nickel Project, Alaska, USA Highlights of the Updated Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate Published 2025-04-22 Verification Approved; not independently verified · Model extracted QA BLOCK: implausible magnitude — grade 9.87% is below plausible Fe ore-grade floor 10% — sub-ore-grade 'Fe' usually means a non-enum commodity (mineral sands THM/VHM, rare-earth TREO, silica SiO2) force-mapped onto the code. Likely a transcription/units error or fabricated row; human review required. QA INFO: partial commodity coverage — the document also reports NiEq for this project, outside the supported commodity list and not captured; this project's stored figures do not include all its commodities. Copies a pre-filled issue record so you can send it through your normal channel.

Inferred

2,087.00 Mt

9.80%

205.00 Mt Fe

10 Mar 2025

Highlights of the Updated Technical Report and Mineral Resource EstimateUnverified

notes (2)

Source: Alaska Energy Metals Files Updated NI 43-101 Technical Report for The Eureka Deposit, Nikolai Nickel Project, Alaska, USA · published 22 Apr 2025

Ref: Highlights of the Updated Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate

Unknown code — Reporting code not yet captured for this row.

QA notes:

QA BLOCK: implausible magnitude — grade 9.80% is below plausible Fe ore-grade floor 10% — sub-ore-grade 'Fe' usually means a non-enum commodity (mineral sands THM/VHM, rare-earth TREO, silica SiO2) force-mapped onto the code. Likely a transcription/units error or fabricated row; human review required. QA INFO: partial commodity coverage — the document also reports NiEq for this project, outside the supported commodity list and not captured; this project's stored figures do not include all its commodities.